Early and repetitive stimulation of the arm can substantially improve the long-term outcome after stroke: A 5-year follow-up study of a randomized trial

被引:121
作者
Feys, H [1 ]
De Weerdt, W
Verbeke, G
Steck, GC
Capiau, C
Kiekens, C
Dejaeger, E
Van Hoydonck, G
Vermeersch, G
Cras, P
机构
[1] Univ Louvain, Fac Phys Educ & Physiotherapy, Dept Rehabil Sci, B-3001 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Univ Louvain, Fac Med, Ctr Biostat, B-3001 Louvain, Belgium
[3] Burgerspital, Ctr med Clin, Dept Rehabil, Solothurn, Switzerland
[4] Univ Louvain, Univ Hosp Pellenebrg, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, B-3001 Louvain, Belgium
[5] Univ Louvain, Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Geriatr, B-3001 Louvain, Belgium
[6] Rehabil Ctr Hof ter Schelde, Dept Physiotherapy, Antwerp, Belgium
[7] OL Vr Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Aalst, Belgium
[8] Univ Antwerp, Dept Neurol, Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
stroke; rehabilitation; clinical trial;
D O I
10.1161/01.STR.0000121645.44752.f7
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose - Several studies have investigated the effect of therapeutic interventions for the arm in the acute phase after stroke, with follow-ups at a maximum of 12 months. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of repetitive sensorimotor training of the arm at 5 years after stroke. Subjects and Methods - One hundred consecutive stroke patients were randomly allocated either to an experimental group that received daily additional sensorimotor stimulation of the arm or to a control group. The intervention period was 6 weeks. Assessments of the patients were made before, midway, and after intervention, and at 6 and 12 months after stroke. In this study, 62 patients were reassessed at 5 years after stroke. The Brunnstrom-Fugl-Meyer (BFM) test, Action Research Arm (ARA) test, and Barthel index (BI) were used as the primary outcome measures. Results - At the 5-year follow-up, there was a statistically significant difference for both the BFM and ARA tests in favor of the experimental group. The mean differences in improvement between the groups from the initial evaluation to the 5-year assessment corresponded to 17 points on the BFM and 17.4 on the ARA. No effect was found for the BI. The treatment was most effective in patients with a severe initial motor deficit. Conclusions - Adding a specific intervention for the arm during the acute phase after a stroke resulted in a clinically meaningful and long-lasting effect on motor function. The effect can be attributed to early, repetitive, and targeted stimulation.
引用
收藏
页码:924 / 929
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   REPETITIVE TRAINING OF ISOLATED MOVEMENTS IMPROVES THE OUTCOME OF MOTOR REHABILITATION OF THE CENTRALLY PARETIC HAND [J].
BUTEFISCH, C ;
HUMMELSHEIM, H ;
DENZLER, P ;
MAURITZ, KH .
JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1995, 130 (01) :59-68
[2]   Neuromuscular stimulation for upper extremity motor and functional recovery in acute hemiplegia [J].
Chae, J ;
Bethoux, F ;
Bohinc, T ;
Dobos, L ;
Davis, T ;
Friedl, A .
STROKE, 1998, 29 (05) :975-979
[3]  
Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
[4]  
Crow J L, 1989, Int Disabil Stud, V11, P155
[5]   Assessment of physiotherapy for patients with stroke [J].
De Weerdt, W ;
Feys, H .
LANCET, 2002, 359 (9302) :182-183
[6]  
Feys H, 2000, Physiother Res Int, V5, P1, DOI 10.1002/pri.180
[7]   Effect of a therapeutic intervention for the hemiplegic upper limb in the acute phase after stroke - A single-blind, randomized, controlled multicenter trial [J].
Feys, HM ;
De Weerdt, WJ ;
Selz, BE ;
Steck, GAC ;
Spichiger, R ;
Vereeck, LE ;
Putman, KD ;
Van Hoydonck, GA .
STROKE, 1998, 29 (04) :785-792
[8]  
FUGLMEYER AR, 1975, SCAND J REHABIL MED, V7, P13
[9]  
Hummelsheim H, 1997, SCAND J REHABIL MED, V29, P3
[10]  
JOHNSTONE M, 1996, RESTORATION MOTOR FU