A Comparison of the Efficacy of Dry Needling, Lidocaine Injection, and Oral Flurbiprofen Treatments in Patients with Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Double-Blind (For Injection, Groups Only), Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:23
作者
Eroglu, Pinar Kucuk [1 ]
Yilmaz, Ozlem [1 ]
Bodur, Hatice [1 ]
Ates, Can [2 ]
机构
[1] Ankara Numune Training & Res Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Ankara Univ, Fac Med, Dept Biostat, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Dry needling; flurbiprofen; lidocaine; myofascial pain syndrome; TRIGGER POINT; PRESSURE ALGOMETER; BOTULINUM-TOXIN; RELIABILITY; RELIEF;
D O I
10.5606/tjr.2013.2779
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess and compare the efficiency of dry needling, lidocaine injection and oral flurbiprofen treatments in patients with myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) involving the neck and back region. Patients and methods: A total of 60 patients (7 males, 53 females; mean age 33.7 years; range 18 to 50 years) were included in this prospective study. The patients were divided into three groups by block randomization. Each group was assigned to dry needling for trigger points, lidocaine injection (double blind) or oral flurbiprofen 200 mg/day over seven days. All patients were also prescribed a standardized home exercise program based on stretching of the affected muscles. Before treatment and on the third and 14 days after treatment, pain severity was assessed by visual analog scale (VAS), degree of tenderness at the trigger points by algometry, active joint range of motion of the neck and shoulders by goniometry, and the quality of life by Nottingham Health Profile. Results: There was a significant improvement in pain severity, trigger point tenderness, joint range of motion, and quality of life in all three groups on the third and 14(th) days of treatment. No significant difference was found in treatment efficiency among the groups. Conclusion: Treatments with dry needling, lidocain injection and oral flurbiprofen along with home exercises are all effective in the management of MPS.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 46
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]
A Randomized, Controlled Study Comparing a Lidocaine Patch, a Placebo Patch, and Anesthetic Injection for Treatment of Trigger Points in Patients With Myofascial Pain Syndrome: Evaluation of Pain and Somatic Pain Thresholds [J].
Affaitati, Giannapia ;
Fabrizio, Alessandra ;
Savini, Antonella ;
Lerza, Rosanna ;
Tafuri, Emmanuele ;
Costantini, Raffaele ;
Lapenna, Domenico ;
Giamberardino, Maria Adele .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2009, 31 (04) :705-720
[2]
Alvarez DJ, 2002, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V65, P653
[3]
Myofascial pain [J].
Borg-Stein, J ;
Simons, DG .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2002, 83 (03) :S40-S47
[4]
Brunner E., 2002, Nonparametric analysis of longitudinal data in factorial experiments
[5]
Celiker R, 1992, J RHEUM MED REHAB, V3, P155
[6]
Cheng Jianguo, 2007, Tech Reg Anesth Pain Manag, V11, P141, DOI 10.1053/j.trap.2007.05.006
[7]
Needling therapies in the management of myofascial trigger point pain: A systematic review [J].
Cummings, TM ;
White, AR .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2001, 82 (07) :986-992
[8]
INTERRATER AND INTRA-RATER RELIABILITY OF THE PRESSURE THRESHOLD METER IN MEASUREMENT OF MYOFASCIAL TRIGGER POINT SENSITIVITY [J].
DELANEY, GA ;
MCKEE, AC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 1993, 72 (03) :136-139
[9]
DICLOFENAC VERSUS LIDOCAINE AS INJECTION THERAPY IN MYOFASCIAL PAIN [J].
FROST, A .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 1986, 15 (02) :153-156
[10]
Intramuscular and nerve root stimulation vs lidocaine injection of trigger points in myofascial pain syndrome [J].
Ga, Hyuk ;
Koh, Hee-Jeong ;
Choi, Ji-Ho ;
Kim, Chang-Hwan .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2007, 39 (05) :374-378