Echo time dependence of BOLD contrast and susceptibility artifacts

被引:71
作者
Gorno-Tempini, ML [1 ]
Hutton, C [1 ]
Josephs, O [1 ]
Deichmann, R [1 ]
Price, C [1 ]
Turner, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Neurol, Wellcome Dept Cognit Neurol, London WC1N 3BG, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
D O I
10.1006/nimg.2001.0967
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Echo-planar imaging with gradient echo allows whole-brain images to be rapidly acquired. However, its main limitation is that magnetic field inhomogeneities in regions of the brain close to bone and air-filled sinuses result in reduced signal-to-noise ratio and signal loss. In particular this is a problem for imaging the temporal lobes, and can therefore affect the results of some language-related studies. Decreasing the echo time (TE) increases the signal-to-noise ratio and reduces the amount of signal loss in susceptible regions. In this study we investigate the TE dependence of BOLD (blood oxygenation level-dependent) contrast and, in particular, how it is influenced in regions with susceptibility artifacts. We use a dual echo-time sequence to compare brain activations measured with two different TEs, TE = 40 ms and TE = 27 ms. The paradigm involves comparing famous faces to scrambled faces, a low-level control condition. It was chosen because famous faces have been repeatedly shown to activate the fusiform gyri and anterior temporal lobes in both PET and fMRI. Our results show that it is possible to detect robust activations at a lower TE in brain regions not affected by susceptibility artifacts (i.e., fusiform gyri), allowing for faster scanning times. However, although the amount of signal loss is reduced at the lower TE, this does not appear to be sufficient to recover the BOLD signal in regions affected by susceptibility artifacts (i.e., anterior temporal lobes). (C) 2002 Elsevier Science.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 142
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   SPIN-ECHO AND GRADIENT-ECHO EPI OF HUMAN BRAIN ACTIVATION USING BOLD CONTRAST - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY AT 1.5 T [J].
BANDETTINI, PA ;
WONG, EC ;
JESMANOWICZ, A ;
HINKS, RS ;
HYDE, JS .
NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 1994, 7 (1-2) :12-20
[2]   A neural basis for lexical retrieval [J].
Damasio, H ;
Grabowski, TJ ;
Tranel, D ;
Hichwa, RD ;
Damasio, AR .
NATURE, 1996, 380 (6574) :499-505
[3]   Optimization of 3-D MP-RAGE sequences for structural brain imaging [J].
Deichmann, R ;
Good, CD ;
Josephs, O ;
Ashburner, J ;
Turner, R .
NEUROIMAGE, 2000, 12 (01) :112-127
[4]  
Deichmann R, 2001, NEUROIMAGE, V13, pS8
[5]   Susceptibility-induced loss of signal: Comparing PET and fMRI on a semantic task [J].
Devlin, JT ;
Russell, RP ;
Davis, MH ;
Price, CJ ;
Wilson, J ;
Moss, HE ;
Matthews, PM ;
Tyler, LK .
NEUROIMAGE, 2000, 11 (06) :589-600
[6]  
EVANS AC, 1994, NATO ADV SCI INST SE, V264, P263
[7]  
Friston K., 1995, HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, V2, P189, DOI [DOI 10.1002/HBM.460020402, 10.1002/hbm.460020402]
[8]  
FRISTON KJ, 2001, IN PRESS NEUROIMAGE
[9]   Experimental determination of the BOLD field strength dependence in vessels and tissue [J].
Gati, JS ;
Menon, RS ;
Ugurbil, K ;
Rutt, BK .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1997, 38 (02) :296-302
[10]   Category differences in brain activation studies: where do they come from? [J].
Gorno-Tempini, ML ;
Cipolotti, L ;
Price, CJ .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2000, 267 (1449) :1253-1258