On the relationship between airport pricing models

被引:44
作者
Basso, Leonardo J. [1 ]
Zhang, Anming [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chile, Dept Civil Engn, Santiago, Chile
[2] Univ British Columbia, Sauder Sch Business, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2, Canada
关键词
airport pricing; airport congestion; vertical structure;
D O I
10.1016/j.trb.2008.01.005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Airport pricing papers can be divided into two approaches. In the traditional approach the demand for airport services depends on airport charges and on congestion costs of both passengers and airlines; the airline market is not formally modeled. In the vertical-structure approach instead, airports provide an input for all airline oligopoly and it is the equilibrium of this downstream market which determines the airports' demand. We prove, analytically, that the traditional approach to airport pricing is valid if air carriers have no market power, i.e. airlines are atomistic or they behave as price takers (perfect competition) and have constant marginal operational costs. When carriers have market power, this approach may result in a surplus measure that falls short of giving a true measure of social surplus. Furthermore, its use prescribes a traffic level that is, for given capacity, smaller than the socially optimal level. When carriers have market power and consequently both airports and airlines behave strategically, a vertical-structure approach appears a more reasonable approach to airport pricing issues. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:725 / 735
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Basso L. J., 2007, ADV AIRLINE EC, V2, P89
[2]  
BASSO LJ, INT J IND O IN PRESS
[3]  
BASSO LJ, 2006, INPUT MARKETS SURPLU
[4]   MARKET CONDUCT IN THE AIRLINE INDUSTRY - AN EMPIRICAL-INVESTIGATION [J].
BRANDER, JA ;
ZHANG, AM .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1990, 21 (04) :567-583
[5]   Internalization of airport congestion: A network analysis [J].
Brueckner, JK .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2005, 23 (7-8) :599-614
[6]   Airport congestion when carriers have market power [J].
Brueckner, JK .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2002, 92 (05) :1357-1375
[7]  
Church J, 2000, IND ORG STRATEGIC AP
[8]   ON THE EXISTENCE OF PURE STRATEGY BERTRAND EQUILIBRIUM [J].
DASTIDAR, KG .
ECONOMIC THEORY, 1995, 5 (01) :19-32
[9]   Comparing Cournot and Bertrand in a homogeneous product market [J].
Dastidar, KG .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 1997, 75 (01) :205-212
[10]  
JACOBSEN SE, 1979, AM ECON REV, V69, P423