Clinical results after cervical laminoplasty - Differences due to the duration of wearing a cervical collar

被引:41
作者
Iizuka, H
Nakagawa, Y
Shimegi, A
Tsutsumi, S
Toda, N
Takagishi, K
Shimizu, T
机构
[1] Gunma Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Sch Med, Maebashi, Gumma 3718511, Japan
[2] Gunma Spine Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Harunaso Hosp, Gunma, Japan
来源
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES | 2005年 / 18卷 / 06期
关键词
cervical spine; laminoplasty; neurologic recovery; radiographic results;
D O I
10.1097/01.bsd.0000154447.83084.b2
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: This investigation assessed the relationship between the duration of wearing a cervical collar and clinical results in patients undergoing laminoplasty. Methods: Twenty-five patients with cervical myelopathy who underwent laminoplasty and wore a cervical collar for 8 weeks post-operatively were followed for an average of 27.3 months. A second group of 26 patients who underwent laminoplasty and wore a cervical collar for 4 weeks was followed for an average of 32.8 months. Results: In both groups, neurologic recovery rate and range of motion on lateral cervical radiographs were longitudinally compared with those obtained preoperatively There was no significant difference in neurologic recovery between the two groups. In patients who wore the cervical collar for 4 weeks, the total range of the cervical spine was better maintained, especially the extension range of the cervical spine, compared with that in the patients who wore the cervical collar for 8 weeks. Conclusions: It is speculated that early removal of the cervical collar prevents contracture of the facet joint and postoperative atrophy and dysfunction of the extensor musculature of the cervical spine.
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 491
页数:3
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]
ASANO S, 1999, 27 ANN M CERV SPIN R
[2]
Corpectomy Versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy -: An independent matched-cohort analysis [J].
Edwards, CC ;
Heller, JG ;
Murakami, H .
SPINE, 2002, 27 (11) :1168-1175
[3]
T-saw laminoplasty for the management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy - Clinical and radiographic outcome [J].
Edwards, CC ;
Heller, JG ;
Silcox, DH .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (14) :1788-1794
[4]
Gillett GR, 1999, BRIT J NEUROSURG, V13, P405
[5]
HAYASHI M, 1998, 26 ANN M CERV SPIN R
[6]
Laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy -: An independent matched cohort analysis [J].
Heller, JG ;
Edwards, CC ;
Murakami, H ;
Rodts, GE .
SPINE, 2001, 26 (12) :1330-1336
[7]
OPERATIVE RESULTS AND POSTOPERATIVE PROGRESSION OF OSSIFICATION AMONG PATIENTS WITH OSSIFICATION OF CERVICAL POSTERIOR LONGITUDINAL LIGAMENT [J].
HIRABAYASHI, K ;
MIYAKAWA, J ;
SATOMI, K ;
MARUYAMA, T ;
WAKANO, K .
SPINE, 1981, 6 (04) :354-364
[8]
CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF EXTENSIVE CERVICAL LAMINECTOMY [J].
ISHIDA, Y ;
SUZUKI, K ;
OHMORI, K ;
KIKATA, Y ;
HATTORI, Y .
NEUROSURGERY, 1989, 24 (02) :215-222
[9]
ITO T, 1985, SPINE, V10, P729
[10]
Japanese Orthopaedic Association, 1994, J JPN ORTHOP ASSOC, V68, P490