Understanding the Social and Ecological Outcomes of PES Projects: A Review and an Analysis

被引:101
作者
Adhikari, Bhim [1 ]
Agrawal, Arun [2 ]
机构
[1] IDRC, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Nat Resources & Environm, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
ecosystem services; markets; payments for ecosystem services; equity; participation; livelihood; environmental sustainability; LAND CONVERSION PROGRAM; ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES HELP; INTEGRATED CONSERVATION; RESOURCE-MANAGEMENT; DESIGNING PAYMENTS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; LESSONS; PARTICIPATION; TECHNOLOGY; POOR;
D O I
10.4103/0972-4923.125748
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
083001 [环境科学];
摘要
Market-based approaches to environmental management, such as payments for ecosystem services (PES), have attracted unprecedented attention during the past decade. In this article, we review 26 case studies on PES from 11 countries in Asia and Latin America to help improve the understanding of the factors affecting PES schemes at the local level. We assess outcomes of the PES interventions in relation to four outcomes: equity, participation, livelihood, and environmental sustainability. Although we consider economic efficiency of these schemes to be crucial for informing policy debates, assessing it was not under the scope of this review. Our analysis shows the importance of property rights and tenure security, transaction costs, household and community characteristics, effective communication about the intervention, and the availability of PES-related information with regard to the sustainability of ecosystem service markets. The review suggests that PES schemes could target improvements in more than one outcome dimension. Focusing on the above five areas can lead to the continued provision of ecosystem services and improvements of the well-being of local inhabitants.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 374
页数:16
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]
Transaction costs and community-based natural resource management in Nepal [J].
Adhikari, B ;
Lovett, JC .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2006, 78 (01) :5-15
[2]
Agarwal C., 2007, NATURAL RESOURCE ISS, V10
[3]
[Anonymous], 2005, ECOSYSTEMS HUMAN WEL
[4]
[Anonymous], 1998, SUSTAINABLE RURAL LI
[5]
[Anonymous], 2009, TEEB THE EC ECOSYSTE
[6]
Arifin B, 2005, I CONSTRAINTS OPPORT
[7]
Arocena-Francisco H., 2003, ENV SERVICES PAYMENT
[8]
Selling two environmental services: In-kind payments for bird habitat and watershed protection in Los Negros, Bolivia [J].
Asquith, Nigel M. ;
Vargas, Maria Teresa ;
Wunder, Sven .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 65 (04) :675-684
[9]
ARE INTEGRATED CONSERVATION-DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS (ICDPS) SUSTAINABLE - ON THE CONSERVATION OF LARGE MAMMALS IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA [J].
BARRETT, CB ;
ARCESE, P .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 1995, 23 (07) :1073-1084
[10]
Wildlife harvest in integrated conservation and development projects: Linking harvest to household demand, agricultural production, and environmental shocks in the Serengeti [J].
Barrett, CB ;
Arcese, P .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1998, 74 (04) :449-465