Avoidable thermodynamic inefficiencies and costs in an externally fired combined cycle power plant

被引:170
作者
Cziesla, F
Tsatsaronis, G
Gao, ZL
机构
[1] Tech Univ Berlin, Inst Energy Engn, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
[2] Zhejiang Univ Technol, Coll Mech Engn, Hangzhou 310032, Peoples R China
关键词
avoidable thermodynamic inefficiencies; cost of thermal systems; exergoeconomic evaluation; externally fired combined cycle;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2005.08.001
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The real thermodynamic inefficiencies in a thermal system are related to exergy destruction and exergy loss. An exergy analysis identifies the system components with the highest exergy destruction and the processes that cause them. However, only a part of the exergy destruction in a component can be avoided. A minimum exergy destruction rate for each system component is imposed by physical, technological, and economic constraints. The difference between the total and the unavoidable exergy destruction rate represents the avoidable exergy destruction rate, which provides a realistic measure of the potential for improving the thermodynamic efficiency of a component. The calculation of avoidable cost rates associated with both exergy destruction and capital investment is described in the paper and is applied to the exergoeconomic evaluation of an externally fired combined cycle power plant. For each plant component, avoidable and unavoidable exergy destructions and investment costs are calculated. The assumptions required for these calculations are discussed. Modified exergoeconomic variables assist in identifying the real potential of improving single plant components. In addition, some aspects of the design and improvement of externally fired combined cycles are discussed. The results of this study show that the concepts of avoidable exergy destruction and avoidable investment cost are very useful in designing cost-effective energy conversion systems. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1472 / 1489
页数:18
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
BAUM J, 2001, FORTSCHRITT BERICH 6, V456
[2]  
Bejan Adrian., 1995, THERMAL DESIGN OPTIM
[3]  
Consonni S., 1996, P INT GAS TURB AER C
[4]  
EISERMANN W, 1984, BRENNST-WARME-KRAFT, V36, P45
[5]  
Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), 1993, TR102276V1R7 EPRI
[6]  
*GE ENT SOFT LLC, 2000, GATECYCLE VERS 5 3 4
[7]  
Lazzaretto A., 1999, P ASME ADV EN SYST D, V39, P421
[8]   On avoidable and unavoidable exergy destructions and investment costs in thermal systems [J].
Tsatsaronis, G ;
Park, MH .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2002, 43 (9-12) :1259-1270
[9]  
Tsatsaronis G, 2002, ENCY PHYS SCI TECHNO, V16, P659, DOI [DOI 10.1016/B0-12-227410-5/00944-3, 10.1016/B0-12-227410-5/00944-3]