Issue contingencies and marketers' recognition of ethical issues, ethical judgments and behavioral intentions

被引:119
作者
Barnett, T [1 ]
Valentine, S
机构
[1] Mississippi State Univ, Coll Business & Ind, Dept Management & IS, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
[2] Univ Wyoming, Coll Business, Dept Management & Mkt, Laramie, WY 82071 USA
关键词
ethical decision-making; issue contingencies; moral intensity; marketing ethics;
D O I
10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00365-X
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The ethical decision-making process begins when an individual recognizes an ethical dilemma. Subsequently, the individual makes a judgment and forms behavioral intentions, which are thought to be predictive of actual behavior. This process is affected by individual, situational and issue-contingent factors. Our study examines the effect of four issue contingencies on marketers' ethical decision-making process. More than 300 marketing professionals took part in our study, responding to questions regarding two sales scenarios. We controlled for relevant individual and situational factors and tested hypotheses using hierarchical regression. Perceptions of a greater magnitude of consequences were positively related to issue recognition and judgments that the action was unethical in both scenarios and behavioral intentions in one scenario. Perceptions of a societal consensus were associated with issue recognition and judgments that the action was unethical in one scenario. Magnitude of consequences demonstrated the strongest relationship with the ethical decision-making process. (C) 2002 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:338 / 346
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Journal of Macromarketing
[3]  
ARMSTRONG SJ, 1978, J MARKETING RES, V14, P396
[4]   Dimensions of moral intensity and ethical decision making: An empirical study [J].
Barnett, T .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 31 (05) :1038-1057
[5]  
Barnett T., 1999, AC MAN CHIC
[6]   A NEW SCALE OF SOCIAL DESIRABILITY INDEPENDENT OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY [J].
CROWNE, DP ;
MARLOWE, D .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING PSYCHOLOGY, 1960, 24 (04) :349-354
[7]   TOWARD UNDERSTANDING MARKETING STUDENTS ETHICAL JUDGMENT OF CONTROVERSIAL PERSONAL SELLING PRACTICES [J].
DABHOLKAR, PA ;
KELLARIS, JJ .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 1992, 24 (04) :313-329
[8]   PERCEPTUAL DIFFERENCES IN MARKET TRANSACTIONS - SOURCE OF CONSUMER FRUSTRATION [J].
DORNOFF, RJ ;
TANKERSLEY, CB .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, 1975, 9 (01) :97-103
[9]   ANALYZING ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING IN MARKETING [J].
DUBINSKY, AJ ;
LOKEN, B .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 1989, 19 (02) :83-107
[10]   MEASURING SOCIAL DESIRABILITY - SHORT FORMS OF THE MARLOWE-CROWNE SOCIAL DESIRABILITY SCALE [J].
FISCHER, DG ;
FICK, C .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1993, 53 (02) :417-424