Initial survival advantage of peritoneal dialysis relative to haemodialysis

被引:272
作者
Heaf, JG
Lokkegaard, H
Madsen, M
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Herlev Hosp, Dept Nephrol, DK-1168 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Univ Aarhus, Skejby Hosp, Dept Nephrol, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
关键词
epidemiology; haemodialysis; peritoneal dialysis; renal transplantation survival;
D O I
10.1093/ndt/17.1.112
中图分类号
R3 [基础医学]; R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1001 ; 1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background. The influence of dialysis modality on prognosis is controversial. In the absence of randomized trials, epidemiological investigations present the best method for studying the problem. Methods. 4568 haemodialysis (HD) and 2443 peritoneal dialysis (PD) records in 4921 dialysis patients treated between 1990 and 1999 were retrieved from the Danish Terminal Uremia register in order to determine the influence of dialysis form on prognosis. The register is national, comprehensive, and incident. Results. Factors reducing survival included age, cardiovascular disease, malignancy, lung disease, diabetes, alcoholism, haematological disease, but not sex or hypertension. Transplant non-candidacy was associated with an adjusted relative risk of 4.7 (CI 4.0-5.6). PD mortality relative to HD (after correction for comorbidity and transplant candidacy) was 0.65 (CI 0.59-0.72, P<0.001) on an 'as treated' and 'history' analysis and 0.86 (CI 0.78-0.95, P<0.01) on an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. The difference was confined to the first 2 years of dialysis. Change in dialysis modality was associated with increased mortality, and change from PD to HD with an accelerated mortality for the first 6 months. This was presumably due to the transfer of sick PD patients, but did not explain the difference. The relative advantage of PD was lower for diabetic patients, where it was not significant on ITT analysis. Dialysis prognosis improved by 14% during the period, with similar results for HD and PD patients. PD patients who were subsequently transplanted had a significantly shorter time to onset of graft function (3.5 vs 5.1 days, P<0.05). Conclusions. These results show a survival advantage for PD during the first 2 years of dialysis treatment. This may be due to unregistered differences in comorbidity at the start of treatment, or may be causal, possibly due to better preservation of residual renal function. The study lends credence to the 'integrative care' approach to uraemia. where patients are started on PD and transferred to HD when PD related mortality increases.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 117
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
BLOEMBERGEN WE, 1995, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V6, P177
[2]   What is the place of peritoneal dialysis in the integrated treatment of renal failure? [J].
Coles, GA ;
Williams, JD .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1998, 54 (06) :2234-2240
[3]   Mortality risks of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis [J].
Collins, AJ ;
Hao, WL ;
Xia, H ;
Ebben, JP ;
Everson, SE ;
Constantini, EG ;
Ma, JZ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1999, 34 (06) :1065-1074
[4]  
DISNEY APS, 1995, AM J KIDNEY DIS, V25, P165
[5]   Hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis: A comparison of adjusted mortality rates [J].
Fenton, SSA ;
Schaubel, DE ;
Desmeules, M ;
Morrison, HI ;
Mao, Y ;
Copleston, P ;
Jeffery, JR ;
Kjellstrand, CM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1997, 30 (03) :334-342
[6]   CLINICAL AND ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC DISEASE IN PATIENTS STARTING END-STAGE RENAL-DISEASE THERAPY [J].
FOLEY, RN ;
PARFREY, PS ;
HARNETT, JD ;
KENT, GM ;
MARTIN, CJ ;
MURRAY, DC ;
BARRE, PE .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 47 (01) :186-192
[7]   Uses and limitations of venal scintigraphy in venal transplantation monitoring [J].
Heaf, JG ;
Iversen, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2000, 27 (07) :871-879
[8]   CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL-DIALYSIS AND HEMODIALYSIS - COMPARISON OF PATIENT MORTALITY WITH ADJUSTMENT FOR COMORBID CONDITIONS [J].
HELD, PJ ;
PORT, FK ;
TURENNE, MN ;
GAYLIN, DS ;
HAMBURGER, RJ ;
WOLFE, RA .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1994, 45 (04) :1163-1169
[9]   DEATH DURING THE FIRST 90 DAYS OF DIALYSIS - A CASE-CONTROL STUDY [J].
KHAN, IH ;
CATTO, GRD ;
EDWARD, N ;
MACLEOD, AM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1995, 25 (02) :276-280
[10]  
Lameire N, 2000, PERITON DIALYSIS INT, V20, pS134