IS PROTECTIONISM ON THE RISE? ASSESSING NATIONAL TRADE POLICIES DURING THE CRISIS OF 2008

被引:70
作者
Kee, Hiau Looi [1 ]
Neagu, Cristina [1 ]
Nicita, Alessandro [2 ]
机构
[1] World Bank, Washington, DC 20433 USA
[2] UN Conf Trade & Dev, Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
RESTRICTIVENESS;
D O I
10.1162/REST_a_00241
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper quantifies trade policy changes and the associated trade impacts for about 100 countries between 2008 and 2009. Results show that there has been no widespread increase in protectionism. Only a few countries, including Russia, Argentina, Turkey, and China, have increased tariffs on major imported products. The United States and the EU, by contrast, rely mainly on antidumping duties to shield domestic industries. Overall, while the rise in tariffs and antidumping duties may have jointly caused global trade to drop by US$43 billion, it explains less than 2% of the collapse in world trade during the crisis period.
引用
收藏
页码:342 / 346
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   A new approach to evaluating trade policy [J].
Anderson, JE ;
Neary, JP .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1996, 63 (01) :107-125
[2]   MEASURING THE RESTRICTIVENESS OF TRACE POLICY [J].
ANDERSON, JE ;
NEARY, JP .
WORLD BANK ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1994, 8 (02) :151-169
[3]   The mercantilist index of trade policy [J].
Anderson, JE ;
Neary, JP .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2003, 44 (02) :627-649
[4]  
[Anonymous], 5274 WORLD BANK
[5]  
[Anonymous], CLIFF BACK CRE UNPUB
[6]  
Baldwin R., 2009, The great trade collapse: Causes, consequences and prospects
[7]  
Baldwin Richard., 2009, The collapse of global trade, murky protectionism, and the crisis: Recommendations for the G20
[8]  
Bown C. P., 2009, EFFECTIVE CRISIS RES, P91
[9]  
Bown Chad P., 2009, Global Antidumping Database
[10]  
EATON J, 2010, TRADE GLOBAL R UNPUB