Extending the quantitative assessment of industrial risks to earthquake effects

被引:102
作者
Campedel, Michela [1 ]
Cozzani, Valerio [1 ]
Garcia-Agreda, Anita [2 ]
Salzano, Ernesto [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dipartimento Ingn Chim Mineraria & Tecnol Ambient, Alma Mater Studiorum, I-40131 Bologna, Italy
[2] CNR, Ist Ric Combust, I-80125 Naples, Italy
关键词
equipment vulnerability models; industrial risk; major accident hazard; NaTech risk analysis; quantitative risk analysis; seismic vulnerability models;
D O I
10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01092.x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
In the general framework of quantitative methods for natural-technological (NaTech) risk analysis, a specific methodology was developed for assessing risks caused by hazardous substances released due to earthquakes. The contribution of accidental scenarios initiated by seismic events to the overall industrial risk was assessed in three case studies derived from the actual plant layout of existing oil refineries. Several specific vulnerability models for different equipment classes were compared and assessed. The effect of differing structural resistances for process equipment on the final risk results was also investigated. The main factors influencing the final risk values resulted from the models for equipment vulnerability and the assumptions for the reference damage states of the process equipment. The analysis of case studies showed that in seismic zones the additional risk deriving from damage caused by earthquakes may be up to more than one order of magnitude higher than that associated to internal failure causes. Critical equipment was determined to be mainly pressurized tanks, even though atmospheric tanks were more vulnerable to containment loss. Failure of minor process equipment having a limited hold-up of hazardous substances (such as pumps) was shown to have limited influence on the final values of the risk increase caused by earthquakes.
引用
收藏
页码:1231 / 1246
页数:16
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1985, EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE EV
[2]  
[Anonymous], 59A NFPA
[3]  
ANTONIONI G, 2006, P PSAM8, V133, P1
[4]   A methodology for the quantitative risk assessment of major accidents triggered by seismic events [J].
Antonioni, Giacomo ;
Spadoni, Gighola ;
Cozzani, Valerio .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2007, 147 (1-2) :48-59
[5]  
*ASCE, 1997, GUID SEISM EV DES PE
[6]   Deterministic vs. probabilistic seismic hazard assessment: An exaggerated and obstructive dichotomy [J].
Bommer, JJ .
JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2002, 6 :43-73
[7]  
CAMPEDEL M, 2008, P PSAM, V9
[8]  
*CCPS, 1989, GUID CHEM PROC QUANT
[9]  
CORNELL CA, 1968, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V58, P1583
[10]  
Cornell CA., 1971, Dy- namic Waves in Civil Engineering, P473