Current status of surgical management of acute cholecystitis in the United States

被引:99
作者
Csikesz, Nicholas [1 ]
Ricciardi, Rocco [2 ]
Tseng, Jennifer F. [1 ]
Shah, Shimul A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Sch Med, Dept Surg Surg Outcomes Anal & Res, Worcester, MA 01655 USA
[2] Lahey Clin Fdn, Dept Surg, Burlington, MA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s00268-008-9679-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background We attempted to determine population-based outcomes of laparoscopic (LC) and open cholecystectomy (OC) for acute cholecystitis (AC). Methods We used the National Hospital Discharge Surveys from 2000 through 2005. Annual medical and demographic data from a national sample of discharge records from nonfederal, short-stay hospitals were queried. We identified all patients who underwent LC or OC for AC. The main outcome measures were the rate of LC or OC and in-hospital morbidity and mortality. One million patients underwent cholecystectomy (859,747 LCs; 152,202 OCs) for AC during 2000-2005. Results Of the cases started laparoscopically, 9.5% were converted to OC. Compared to OC, patients who underwent LC were more likely to be discharged home (91% vs. 70%), carry private insurance (47% vs. 30%), suffer less morbidity (16% vs. 36%), and have a lower unadjusted mortality (0.4% vs. 3.0%). OC was associated with a 1.3-fold increase (95% confidence interval 1.1-1.4) in perioperative morbidity compared to LC after adjusting for patient and hospital factors. Conclusions Most patients in the 21st century with AC undergo LC with a low conversion rate and low morbidity. In the general population with acute cholecystitis, LC results in lower morbidity and mortality rates than OC even in the setting of open conversion.
引用
收藏
页码:2230 / 2236
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: Can the need for conversion and the probability of complications be predicted? A prospective study [J].
Brodsky, A ;
Matter, I ;
Sabo, E ;
Cohen, A ;
Abrahamson, J ;
Eldar, S .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2000, 14 (08) :755-760
[2]   A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION [J].
CHARLSON, ME ;
POMPEI, P ;
ALES, KL ;
MACKENZIE, CR .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05) :373-383
[3]   THE EUROPEAN EXPERIENCE WITH LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY [J].
CUSCHIERI, A ;
DUBOIS, F ;
MOUIEL, J ;
MOURET, P ;
BECKER, H ;
BUESS, G ;
TREDE, M ;
TROIDL, H .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1991, 161 (03) :385-387
[4]  
Dennison C, 2000, Vital Health Stat 1, P1
[5]   ADAPTING A CLINICAL COMORBIDITY INDEX FOR USE WITH ICD-9-CM ADMINISTRATIVE DATABASES [J].
DEYO, RA ;
CHERKIN, DC ;
CIOL, MA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 45 (06) :613-619
[6]   Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis [J].
Eldar, S ;
Sabo, E ;
Nash, E ;
Abrahamson, J ;
Matter, I .
SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY & ENDOSCOPY, 1997, 7 (05) :407-414
[7]   Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: Prospective trial [J].
Eldar, S ;
Sabo, E ;
Nash, E ;
Abrahamson, J ;
Matter, I .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 21 (05) :540-545
[8]  
Estes NC, 1996, AM SURGEON, V62, P598
[9]   Bile duct injury during cholecystectomy and survival in medicare beneficiaries [J].
Flum, DR ;
Cheadle, A ;
Prela, C ;
Dellinger, EP ;
Chan, L .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 290 (16) :2168-2173
[10]   Treatment of acute cholecystitis - A comparison of open vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J].
Glavic, Z ;
Begic, L ;
Simlesa, D ;
Rukavina, A .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2001, 15 (04) :398-401