Diagnosing Neuropathic Pain in Patients with Cancer: Comparative Analysis of Recommendations in National Guidelines from European Countries

被引:20
作者
Piano, Virginie [1 ,2 ]
Verhagen, Stans [2 ,3 ]
Schalkwijk, Annelies [2 ]
Burgers, Jako [4 ]
Kress, Hans [5 ]
Treede, Rolf-Detlef [6 ]
Hekster, Yechiel [7 ]
Lanteri-Minet, Michel [1 ]
Engels, Yvonne [2 ]
Vissers, Kris [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nice, Med Ctr, Dept Pain & Palliat Care, Nice, France
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol Pain & Palliat Med, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Dutch Coll Gen Practitioners NHG, Dept Guideline Dev & Res, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Med Univ AKH Vienna, Dept Special Anesthesiol & Pain Therapy, Vienna, Austria
[6] Heidelberg Univ, Med Fac Mannheim, Dept Neurophysiol, Mannheim, Germany
[7] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Clin Pharm, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
cancer; Neuralgia; evidence-based medicine; pain Assessment; clinical practice guidelines; CPG; European guidelines; QUESTIONNAIRE; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1111/papr.12018
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 [麻醉学];
摘要
Background Neuropathic pain is a prevalent symptom in patients with cancer, which needs a more specific algorithm than nociceptive pain or neuropathic pain from other origin. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) can be helpful in optimizing the diagnosis of neuropathic pain in patients with cancer. Methods In this study, 9 national CPGs in Europe on the diagnosis of neuropathic pain in patients with cancer were included. Recommendations with their grade (according SIGN 55 classification) and supporting literature (first author, patients' population, year, and type of publication) were compared between CPGs. Results Nine CPGs including recommendations on neuropathic pain could be selected and were assessed. In total, they used 149 references of which 72 (48%) were about cancer conditions, 39 (26%) about neuropathic pain, and only 3 about neuropathic pain in patients with cancer (2%). Only 28 (19%) references were shared between 2 or more guidelines. There was only one shared reference specifically related to cancer neuropathic pain. Recommendations and their evidence grading strongly differ between CPGs. Conclusion This work demonstrates an important heterogeneity between European recommendations on diagnosis and assessment of neuropathic pain in patients with cancer. The main weaknesses are the low level of evidence and the absence of specific data focusing on neuropathic pain in patients with cancer. We recommend that physicians dealing with neuropathic pain in patients with cancer should be specially trained, that a specific methodology to develop CPGs should followed, and that specific research should be developed on the diagnosis of neuropathic pain in patients with cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 439
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]
AIOM Linea Guida, 2008, TER DOL ONC
[2]
[Anonymous], 2007, NASJ HANDL PROGR MED
[3]
[Anonymous], CA CANC J CLIN, DOI DOI 10.3322/CAAC.20107
[4]
[Anonymous], 2008, GUIA PRACTICA CLIN C
[5]
ASL, 2006, REC CONTR DOL NEOPL
[6]
The specific disease burden of neuropathic pain: Results of a French nationwide survey [J].
Attal, Nadine ;
Lanteri-Minet, Michel ;
Laurent, Bernard ;
Fermanian, Jacques ;
Bouhassira, Didier .
PAIN, 2011, 152 (12) :2836-2843
[7]
REGULAR USE OF A VERBAL PAIN SCALE IMPROVES THE UNDERSTANDING OF ONCOLOGY INPATIENT PAIN INTENSITY [J].
AU, E ;
LOPRINZI, CL ;
DHODAPKAR, M ;
NELSON, T ;
NOVOTNY, P ;
HAMMACK, J ;
OFALLON, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1994, 12 (12) :2751-2755
[8]
Neuropathic pain questionnaire - Short form [J].
Backonja, MM ;
Krause, SJ .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2003, 19 (05) :315-316
[9]
Ballantyne J.C., 2012, Pain Clinical Updates, V20, P1
[10]
The S-LANSS score for identifying pain of predominantly neuropathic origin: Validation for use in clinical and postal research [J].
Bennett, MI ;
Smith, BH ;
Torrance, N ;
Potter, J .
JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2005, 6 (03) :149-158