Acute stress selectively reduces reward sensitivity

被引:103
作者
Berghorst, Lisa H. [1 ,2 ]
Bogdan, Ryan [3 ]
Frank, Michael J. [4 ,5 ]
Pizzagalli, Diego A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Dept Psychol, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Ctr Depress Anxiety & Stress Res, Sch Med, McLean Hosp, Belmont, MA 02478 USA
[3] Washington Univ, Dept Psychol, BRAIN Lab, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[4] Brown Univ, Brown Inst Brain Sci, Dept Psychiat, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[5] Brown Univ, Brown Inst Brain Sci, Dept Cognit Linguist & Psychol Sci, Providence, RI 02912 USA
关键词
affect-cognition interactions; stress; anhedonia; reward; punishment; cortisol; depression; emotion; DEPRESSION INVENTORY-II; CORTISOL RESPONSES; LIFE EVENTS; ANXIETY; THREAT; REINFORCEMENT; ACTIVATION; CHALLENGE; YOUNGER; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3389/fnhum.2013.00133
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 [神经生物学];
摘要
Stress may promote the onset of psychopathology by disrupting reward processing. However, the extent to which stress impairs reward processing, rather than incentive processing more generally, is unclear. To evaluate the specificity of stress-induced reward processing disruption, 100 psychiatrically healthy females were administered a probabilistic stimulus selection task (PSST) that enabled comparison of sensitivity to reward-driven (Go) and punishment-driven (NoGo) learning under either "no stress" or "stress" (threat-of-shock) conditions. Cortisol samples and self-report measures were collected. Contrary to hypotheses, the groups did not differ significantly in task performance or cortisol reactivity. However, further analyses focusing only on individuals under "stress" who were high responders with regard to both cortisol reactivity and self-reported negative affect revealed reduced reward sensitivity relative to individuals tested in the "no stress" condition; importantly, these deficits were reward-specific. Overall, findings provide preliminary evidence that stress-reactive individuals show diminished sensitivity to reward, but not punishment, under stress. While such results highlight the possibility that stress-induced anhedonia might be an important mechanism linking stress to affective disorders, future studies are necessary to confirm this conjecture.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]
American Psychiatric Association, 2013, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, DOI 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
[2]
Stress, depression, and anhedonia: Caveats concerning animal models [J].
Anisman, H ;
Matheson, K .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2005, 29 (4-5) :525-546
[3]
THE EFFECT OF STRESS ON HEDONIC CAPACITY [J].
BERENBAUM, H ;
CONNELLY, J .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 102 (03) :474-481
[4]
Berghorst LH., 2010, Next Generation Antidepressants: Moving Beyonf Monoamins to Discover Novel and Differntiated Treatment Strategies for Mood Disorders, P70
[5]
The impact of mineralocorticoid receptor ISO/VAL genotype (rs5522) and stress on reward learning [J].
Bogdan, R. ;
Perlis, R. H. ;
Fagerness, J. ;
Pizzagalli, D. A. .
GENES BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR, 2010, 9 (06) :658-667
[6]
Acute stress reduces reward responsiveness: Implications for depression [J].
Bogdan, Ryan ;
Pizzagalli, Diego A. .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 60 (10) :1147-1154
[7]
Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor Type 1 (CRHR1) Genetic Variation and Stress Interact to Influence Reward Learning [J].
Bogdan, Ryan ;
Santesso, Diane L. ;
Fagerness, Jesen ;
Perlis, Roy H. ;
Pizzagalli, Diego A. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 31 (37) :13246-13254
[8]
Stress, depression and the mesolimbic dopamine system [J].
Cabib, S ;
PuglisiAllegra, S .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 128 (04) :331-342
[9]
Opposite imbalances between mesocortical and mesoaccumbens dopamine responses to stress by the same genotype depending on living conditions [J].
Cabib, S ;
Ventura, R ;
Puglisi-Allegra, S .
BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2002, 129 (1-2) :179-185
[10]
Psychometric evaluation of the behavioral inhibition/behavioral activation scales in a large sample of outpatients with anxiety and mood disorders [J].
Campbell-Sills, L ;
Liverant, GI ;
Brown, TA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2004, 16 (03) :244-254