The performance of several indicators in detecting recall bias

被引:27
作者
Basso, O
Olsen, J
Bisanti, L
Karmaus, W
Juul, S
Fletcher, T
Bolumar, F
FigaTalamanca, I
Thonneau, P
Pantelakis, S
机构
[1] UNIV PAVIA,IST SCI SANITARIE APPL,I-27100 PAVIA,ITALY
[2] SERV EPIDEMIOL & SISTEMA INFORMAT,MILAN,ITALY
[3] NORDIG INST HLTH RES & PREVENT,HAMBURG,GERMANY
关键词
recall bias; self reported exposure; case control studies; methodology;
D O I
10.1097/00001648-199705000-00007
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Self-reported exposure data are vulnerable to differential recall, which threatens the internal validity and thus the credibility of the study. When a proxy measure of the exposure of interest is available, it may be possible to check for the presence of recall bias due to misclassification of the exposure information. We present a number of indicators of recall bias for case-control studies, and we describe their behavior by means of computer simulations. The indicators are all based upon a comparison between self-reported exposure data and data on job titles grouped into exposure-specific matrices. The indicators are based upon the assumption that job titles are reported without differential misclassification for cases as well as controls. We also assume that exposure data are reported with the same accuracy by workers in different jobs. Under these assumptions, the proposed indicators will provide valuable-although not conclusive-signs of recall bias. The principles elaborated in this paper can be applied to other situations in which self-reported exposure data are used.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 274
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] VALIDITY OF EXPOSURE DATA OBTAINED BY QUESTIONNAIRE - 2 EXAMPLES FROM OCCUPATIONAL REPRODUCTIVE STUDIES
    AHLBORG, GA
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 1990, 16 (04) : 284 - 288
  • [3] Shift work and subfecundity: A European multicenter study
    Bisanti, L
    Olsen, J
    Basso, O
    Thonneau, P
    Karmaus, W
    Juul, S
    Fletcher, T
    Bolumar, F
    FigaTalamanca, I
    Pantelakis, S
    Spinelli, A
    Schaumburg, I
    Wulff, M
    Biczysko, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 1996, 38 (04) : 352 - 358
  • [4] Bolumar F, 1996, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V143, P578
  • [5] PERFORMANCE OF ODDS RATIOS OBTAINED WITH A JOB-EXPOSURE MATRIX AND INDIVIDUAL EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO MISCLASSIFICATION ERRORS
    BOUYER, J
    DARDENNE, J
    HEMON, D
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 1995, 21 (04) : 265 - 271
  • [6] RECALL BIAS IN CASE-CONTROL STUDIES - AN EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS AND THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
    CHOUINARD, E
    WALTER, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 48 (02) : 245 - 254
  • [7] COUGHLIN SS, 1990, OCCUP MED, V5, P633
  • [8] RECALL BIAS IN A CASE-CONTROL STUDY OF SUDDEN-INFANT-DEATH-SYNDROME
    DREWS, CD
    KRAUS, JF
    GREENLAND, S
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 19 (02) : 405 - 411
  • [9] TAP OR BOTTLED WATER-CONSUMPTION AND SPONTANEOUS-ABORTION IN A CASE-CONTROL STUDY OF REPORTING CONSISTENCY
    FENSTER, L
    WINDHAM, GC
    SWAN, SH
    EPSTEIN, DM
    NEUTRA, RR
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 3 (02) : 120 - 124
  • [10] ASSESSMENT OF REPORTING CONSISTENCY IN A CASE-CONTROL STUDY OF SPONTANEOUS-ABORTIONS
    FENSTER, L
    SWAN, SH
    WINDHAM, GC
    NEUTRA, RR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1991, 133 (05) : 477 - 488