The impact of after-school peer contact on early adolescent externalizing problems is moderated by parental monitoring, perceived neighborhood safety, and prior adjustment

被引:217
作者
Pettit, GS [1 ]
Bates, JE
Dodge, KA
Meece, DW
机构
[1] Auburn Univ, Dept Human Dev & Family Studies, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[3] Indiana Univ, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1467-8624.00055
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Unsupervised peer contact in the after-school hours was examined as a risk factor in the development of externalizing problems in a longitudinal sample of early adolescents. Parental monitoring, neighborhood safety, and adolescents' preexisting behavioral problems were considered as possible moderators of the risk relation. Interviews with mothers provided information on monitoring, neighborhood safety, and demographics. Early adolescent (ages 12-13 years) after-school time use was assessed via a telephone interview in grade 6 (N = 438); amount of time spent with peers when no adult was present was tabulated. Teacher ratings of externalizing behavior problems were collected in grades 6 and 7. Unsupervised peer contact, lack of neighborhood safety, and low monitoring incrementally predicted grade 7 externalizing problems, after controlling for family background factors and grade 6 problems. The greatest risk was for those unsupervised adolescents living in low-monitoring homes and comparatively unsafe neighborhoods. The significant relation between unsupervised peer contact and problem behavior in grade 7 held only for those adolescents who already were high in problem behavior in grade 6. These findings point to the need to consider individual, family, and neighborhood factors in evaluating risks associated with young adolescents' after-school care experiences.
引用
收藏
页码:768 / 778
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Achenbach T., 1991, Manual for the youth self-report and 1991 profile
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, COERCION PUNISHMENT, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511527906
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1991, YOUNG ADOLESCENTS DI
[4]   DO NEIGHBORHOODS INFLUENCE CHILD AND ADOLESCENT DEVELOPMENT [J].
BROOKSGUNN, J ;
DUNCAN, GJ ;
KLEBANOV, PK ;
SEALAND, N .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1993, 99 (02) :353-395
[5]  
Capaldi D., 1989, Psychometric properties of fourteen latent constructs from the Oregon Youth Study
[6]   Economic hardship and the development of five- and six-year-olds: Neighborhood and regional perspectives [J].
ChaseLansdale, PL ;
Gordon, RA .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1996, 67 (06) :3338-3367
[7]  
COHEN J, 1993, APPL MULTIPLE REGRES
[8]   Relations of parental supervision and monitoring to children's functioning in various contexts: Moderating effects of families and neighborhoods [J].
Coley, RL ;
Hoffman, LW .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 17 (01) :51-68
[9]  
FOX JA, 1998, AFTER SCH CRIME AFTE
[10]   OUT-OF-SCHOOL CARE OF YOUNG ADOLESCENTS AND SELF-REPORTED BEHAVIOR [J].
GALAMBOS, NL ;
MAGGS, JL .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 27 (04) :644-655