Distinguishing levels of tinnitus distress

被引:61
作者
Andersson, G
Lyttkens, L
Larsen, HC
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Psychol, SE-75142 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Univ Uppsala Hosp, Dept Audiol, Uppsala, Sweden
来源
CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY | 1999年 / 24卷 / 05期
关键词
tinnitus; structured interview; psychology; psychoacoustics; minimal masking level;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2273.1999.00278.x
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Degrees of tinnitus distress were explored in a sample of 216 patients who completed audiological measures and were assessed in a structured interview conducted by a clinical psychologist. The Klockhoff and Lindblom grading system was used and its inter-rater reliability assessed in a subsample showing a high degree of correspondence. Results from the interview are reported in terms of variability of tinnitus, characteristics of problematic situations, distress caused by tinnitus, possibilities to cope, and other influencing factors. Finally, a set of discriminant analyses were conducted on the data set resulting in a final model which included pitch, minimal masking level (MML), tolerance in relation to onset, and avoidance of situations because of tinnitus. This model correctly classified 73% of the subjects into the two levels of distress (grade II and III). There may be a potential role for MML as an outcome variable in tinnitus treatment research.
引用
收藏
页码:404 / 410
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Andersson G, 1998, AUDIOLOGY, V37, P174
[2]  
AXELSSON A, 1989, British Journal of Audiology, V23, P53, DOI 10.3109/03005368909077819
[3]   A BEHAVIORAL NOSOLOGY FOR TINNITUS [J].
BRINER, W .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1995, 77 (01) :27-34
[4]  
COLLET L, 1990, AUDIOLOGY, V29, P101
[5]  
DAUMAN R, 1992, TINNITUS 91, P225
[7]   Audiological and psychological characteristics of a group of tinnitus sufferers, prior to tinnitus management training [J].
Dineen, R ;
Doyle, J ;
Bench, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 1997, 31 (01) :27-38
[8]  
DOUEK E, 1981, TINNITUS, P4
[9]  
Erlandsson S. I., 1990, THESIS U GOTEBORG
[10]  
GEORGE R N, 1991, British Journal of Audiology, V25, P331, DOI 10.3109/03005369109076606