Valuing the attributes of renewable energy investments

被引:305
作者
Bergmann, A
Hanley, M
Wright, R
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Dept Econ, Glasgow G12 8RT, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Univ Stirling, Dept Econ, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland
关键词
renewable energy; external costs and benefits; choice experiments;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.035
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Increasing the proportion of power derived from renewable energy sources is becoming an increasingly important part of many countries's strategies to achieve reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. However, renewable energy investments can often have external costs and benefits, which need to be taken into account if socially optimal investments are to be made. This paper attempts to estimate the magnitude of these external costs and benefits for the case of renewable technologies in Scotland, a country which has set particularly ambitious targets for expanding renewable energy. The external effects we consider are those on landscape quality, wildlife and air quality. We also consider the welfare implications of different investment strategies for employment and electricity prices. The methodology used to do this is the choice experiment technique. Renewable technologies considered include hydro, onshore and off-shore wind power and biomass. Welfare changes for different combinations of impacts associated with different investment strategies are estimated. We also test for differences in preferences towards these impacts between urban and rural communities, and between high- and low-income households. (c) 2004 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1004 / 1014
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Using conjoint analysis to quantify public preferences over the environmental impacts of wind farms. An example from Spain [J].
Alvarez-Farizo, B ;
Hanley, N .
ENERGY POLICY, 2002, 30 (02) :107-116
[2]  
[Anonymous], FRONTIERS ECONOMETRI
[3]  
Ben-Akiva M., 1985, Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand
[4]  
Bennett J., 2001, CHOICE MODELLING APP
[5]  
De Vries HJ, 2003, RENEWABLE ELECT POLI
[6]  
DEWAR M, 2003, REPORT U GLASGOW REN
[7]  
DTI, 2003, EN WHIT PAP OUR EN F
[8]  
EK K, 2002, THESIS LULEA U TECHN, P40
[9]   Contingent valuation versus choice experiments: Estimating the benefits of environmentally sensitive areas in Scotland [J].
Hanley, N ;
MacMillan, D ;
Wright, RE ;
Bullock, C ;
Simpson, I ;
Parsisson, D ;
Crabtree, B .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 49 (01) :1-15
[10]   Appraising renewable energy developments in remote communities: the case of the North Assynt Estate, Scotland [J].
Hanley, N ;
Nevin, C .
ENERGY POLICY, 1999, 27 (09) :527-547