Plasma etch modeling using optical emission spectroscopy

被引:40
作者
Chen, RW [1 ]
Huang, H [1 ]
Spanos, CJ [1 ]
Gatto, M [1 ]
机构
[1] ADV MICRO DEVICES INC,AUSTIN,TX 78741
来源
JOURNAL OF VACUUM SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY A-VACUUM SURFACES AND FILMS | 1996年 / 14卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1116/1.580357
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
Plasma etching is often considered a yield limiter in the manufacturing of Submicron integrated circuit devices. Much effort has been devoted to developing reliable models that relate the process outputs to variations in real-time sensor signals. These models, called chamber state models, allow semiconductor manufacturers to predict etch behavior. In this article, we propose to use optical emission spectroscopy (OES) as a real-time sensor to quantify and predict the etching performance in an integrated circuit manufacturing line. This method is especially useful in plasma processing because it provides in situ and real-time analysis without disturbing the plasma or interfering with the process. This study is based on an OES system that has been installed on an Applied Materials 5300 Centura dielectric etcher with a single optical fiber connected from the reactor viewport to a spectrograph. A designed experiment was performed on oxide test wafers. Several etch characteristics, including etch rate, within-wafer uniformity, and aspect-ratio dependent etching (ARDE), were modeled in this study. Various modeling techniques such as multivariate principle component analysis, and partial least squares were employed to relate the various OES signatures to etching performance. The results show that 87% of etch rate variation and more than 95% of the variation in within-wafer uniformity can be explained by these models, although the OES signals can only explain 65% of the variation in ARDE. (C) 1996 American Vacuum Society.
引用
收藏
页码:1901 / 1906
页数:6
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
ANDERRSON HM, 1993, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V2091, P333
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1979, Multivariate analysis
[3]  
BOX GEP, 1978, STATISTICS EXPT
[4]  
Chan J. A., 1995, Semiconductor International, V18, P85
[5]   A STATISTICAL VIEW OF SOME CHEMOMETRICS REGRESSION TOOLS [J].
FRANK, IE ;
FRIEDMAN, JH .
TECHNOMETRICS, 1993, 35 (02) :109-135
[6]   PARTIAL LEAST-SQUARES METHODS FOR SPECTRAL ANALYSES .1. RELATION TO OTHER QUANTITATIVE CALIBRATION METHODS AND THE EXTRACTION OF QUALITATIVE INFORMATION [J].
HAALAND, DM ;
THOMAS, EV .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1988, 60 (11) :1193-1202
[7]   VLSI PROCESS MODELING - SUPREM-III [J].
HO, CP ;
PLUMMER, JD ;
HANSEN, SE ;
DUTTON, RW .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES, 1983, 30 (11) :1438-1453
[8]  
Jackson JE, 1991, A user's guide to principal components
[9]   PREDICTION OF WAFER STATE AFTER PLASMA PROCESSING USING REAL-TIME TOOL DATA [J].
LEE, SF ;
SPANOS, CJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING, 1995, 8 (03) :252-261
[10]   PROCESS MONITORING AND DIAGNOSIS BY MULTIBLOCK PLS METHODS [J].
MACGREGOR, JF ;
JAECKLE, C ;
KIPARISSIDES, C ;
KOUTOUDI, M .
AICHE JOURNAL, 1994, 40 (05) :826-838