Protecting Important Sites for Biodiversity Contributes to Meeting Global Conservation Targets

被引:200
作者
Butchart, Stuart H. M. [1 ,2 ]
Scharlemann, Joern P. W. [2 ]
Evans, Mike I. [1 ]
Quader, Suhel [3 ]
Arico, Salvatore [4 ]
Arinaitwe, Julius [5 ]
Balman, Mark [1 ]
Bennun, Leon A. [1 ]
Bertzky, Bastian [2 ]
Besancon, Charles [2 ]
Boucher, Timothy M. [6 ]
Brooks, Thomas M. [7 ,8 ,9 ]
Burfield, Ian J. [1 ]
Burgess, Neil D. [10 ,11 ]
Chan, Simba [12 ]
Clay, Rob P. [13 ]
Crosby, Mike J. [1 ]
Davidson, Nicholas C. [14 ]
De Silva, Naamal [15 ]
Devenish, Christian [13 ]
Dutson, Guy C. L. [16 ]
Fernandez, David F. Dia Z. [17 ]
Fishpool, Lincoln D. C. [1 ]
Fitzgerald, Claire [2 ]
Foster, Matt [18 ]
Heath, Melanie F. [1 ]
Hockings, Marc [19 ]
Hoffmann, Michael [2 ,15 ,20 ]
Knox, David [21 ]
Larsen, Frank W. [15 ]
Lamoreux, John F. [18 ]
Loucks, Colby [11 ]
May, Ian [1 ]
Millett, James [22 ,23 ]
Molloy, Dominic [23 ]
Morling, Paul [23 ]
Parr, Mike [24 ]
Ricketts, Taylor H. [25 ]
Seddon, Nathalie [26 ]
Skolnik, Benjamin [24 ]
Stuart, Simon N. [2 ,15 ,20 ,27 ,28 ]
Upgren, Amy [15 ]
Woodley, Stephen [29 ]
机构
[1] BirdLife Int, Cambridge, England
[2] United Nations Environm Programme World Conservat, Cambridge, England
[3] Tata Inst Fundamental Res, Natl Ctr Biol Sci, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
[4] United Nations Educ Sci & Cultural Org, Paris, France
[5] BirdLife Int Africa Partnership Secretariat, Nairobi, Kenya
[6] Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA USA
[7] NatureServe, Arlington, VA USA
[8] Univ Philippines, Int Ctr Res Agroforestry, World Agroforestry Ctr, Los Banos, Philippines
[9] Univ Tasmania, Sch Geog & Environm Studies, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[10] Univ Copenhagen, Ctr Macroecol Evolut & Climate, Dept Biol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[11] World Wildlife Fund, Conservat Sci Program, Washington, DC 20037 USA
[12] BirdLife Int Asia Reg Off, Tokyo, Japan
[13] BirdLife Int Amer Secretariat, Quito, Ecuador
[14] Secretariat Ramsar Convent Wetlands, Gland, Switzerland
[15] Conservat Int, Arlington, VA USA
[16] Birds Australia, Carlton, Vic, Australia
[17] Aves & Conservac, Quito, Ecuador
[18] Natl Fish & Wildlife Fdn, Washington, DC USA
[19] Univ Queensland, Sch Geog Planning & Environm Management, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[20] Species Survival Commiss, Gland, Switzerland
[21] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[22] BirdLife Int Pacific Partnership Secretariat, Suva, Fiji
[23] Royal Soc Protect Birds, Sandy SG19 2DL, Beds, England
[24] Amer Bird Conservancy, Washington, DC USA
[25] Univ Vermont, Gund Inst Ecol Econ, Burlington, VT USA
[26] Dept Zool, Oxford OX1 3PS, England
[27] Univ Bath, Dept Biol & Biochem, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
[28] Al Ain Wildlife Pk & Resort, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
[29] Pk Canada, Nat Resources Branch, Hull, PQ, Canada
来源
PLOS ONE | 2012年 / 7卷 / 03期
关键词
AREAS; TRENDS; INVESTMENT; RETURN; COSTS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0032529
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Protected areas (PAs) are a cornerstone of conservation efforts and now cover nearly 13% of the world's land surface, with the world's governments committed to expand this to 17%. However, as biodiversity continues to decline, the effectiveness of PAs in reducing the extinction risk of species remains largely untested. We analyzed PA coverage and trends in species' extinction risk at globally significant sites for conserving birds (10,993 Important Bird Areas, IBAs) and highly threatened vertebrates and conifers (588 Alliance for Zero Extinction sites, AZEs) (referred to collectively hereafter as 'important sites'). Species occurring in important sites with greater PA coverage experienced smaller increases in extinction risk over recent decades: the increase was half as large for bird species with >50% of the IBAs at which they occur completely covered by PAs, and a third lower for birds, mammals and amphibians restricted to protected AZEs (compared with unprotected or partially protected sites). Globally, half of the important sites for biodiversity conservation remain unprotected (49% of IBAs, 51% of AZEs). While PA coverage of important sites has increased over time, the proportion of PA area covering important sites, as opposed to less important land, has declined (by 0.45-1.14% annually since 1950 for IBAs and 0.79-1.49% annually for AZEs). Thus, while appropriately located PAs may slow the rate at which species are driven towards extinction, recent PA network expansion has under-represented important sites. We conclude that better targeted expansion of PA networks would help to improve biodiversity trends.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Measuring the effectiveness of protected area networks in reducing deforestation [J].
Andam, Kwaw S. ;
Ferraro, Paul J. ;
Pfaff, Alexander ;
Sanchez-Azofeifa, G. Arturo ;
Robalino, Juan A. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2008, 105 (42) :16089-16094
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, MON IMP BIRD AR GLOB
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, COP DEC X 2 STRAT PL
[4]  
[Anonymous], BIRDLIFE INT STAT WO
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2007, CIA WORLD FACTB
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2009, BIOSCIENCE
[7]   Global variation in terrestrial conservation costs, conservation benefits, and unmet conservation needs [J].
Balmford, A ;
Gaston, KJ ;
Blyth, S ;
James, A ;
Kapos, V .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (03) :1046-1050
[8]   Poor overlap between the distribution of Protected Areas and globally threatened birds in Africa [J].
Beresford, A. E. ;
Buchanan, G. M. ;
Donald, P. F. ;
Butchart, S. H. M. ;
Fishpool, L. D. C. ;
Rondinini, C. .
ANIMAL CONSERVATION, 2011, 14 (02) :99-107
[9]  
Beyer H. L., GEOSPATIAL MODELLING
[10]  
BirdLife International, 2004, IMP BIRD AR AS KEY S