Do social influences contribute to occupational differences in quitting smoking and attitudes toward quitting?

被引:87
作者
Sorensen, G
Emmons, K
Stoddard, AM
Linnan, L
Avrunin, J
机构
[1] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Ctr Community Based Res, Dept Adult Oncol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth & Social Behav, Boston, MA USA
[3] Univ Massachusetts, Sch Publ Hlth & Human Sci, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[4] Brown Univ, Miriam Hosp, Providence, RI USA
关键词
worksites; social influences; social norms; smoking;
D O I
10.4278/0890-1171-16.3.135
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Purpose. To examine occupational differences in social influences supporting quitting smoking and their relationships to intentions and self-efficacy to quit smoking and to quitting. Design. Data were collected as part of a large worksite cancer prevention intervention trial. Setting. Forty-four worksites, Subjects. Subjects included 2626 smokers from a total baseline survey sample of 11,456 employers (response rate = 63%). Measures. Differences by job category in social support for quitting, Pressure to quit smoking rewards for quitting, and nonacceptability of smoking were measured using mixed model analysis of variance and the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, Their association to self-efficacy, intention to quit, and quitting smoking was assessed using mixed model analysis of variance and linear logistic regression modeling. Results. Compared with other workers, blue-collar workers reported less pressure to quit (p =.0001), social support for quitting (p =. 0001), and nonacceptability of smoking among their coworkers (p <.001). Intention to quit was associated with higher levels of social pressure to quit smoking (p =.0001) and social support for quitting (p =.002). Self-efficacy was associated with social pressure to quit (p =.0001), social support for quitting (p =. 004), and perceiving greater rewards for quitting (p =. 0001). Conclusions. Although these results are limited somewhat by response and attrition rates, these, results suggest that differing social environments may contribute to the differences by occupational category in smoking prevalence and smoking cessation.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 141
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
ABRAMS DB, 1994, PREV MED, P1
[2]  
AMICK BC, 1995, COMMUNITY HLTH, P46
[3]   HAS THE USE OF CERVICAL, BREAST, AND COLORECTAL-CANCER SCREENING INCREASED IN THE UNITED-STATES [J].
ANDERSON, LM ;
MAY, DS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1995, 85 (06) :840-842
[4]  
[Anonymous], CANC FACTS FIG 1998
[5]   ASSESSMENT OF COMMUNITY-LEVEL INFLUENCES ON INDIVIDUALS ATTITUDES ABOUT CIGARETTE-SMOKING, ALCOHOL-USE, AND CONSUMPTION OF DIETARY-FAT [J].
CURRY, SJ ;
WAGNER, EH ;
CHEADLE, A ;
DIEHR, P ;
KOEPSELL, T ;
PSATY, B ;
MCBRIDE, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1993, 9 (02) :78-84
[6]  
FIORE MC, 2000, CLIN PRACTICE GUIDEL
[7]  
Giovino G, 2000, PREVALENCE SELECTED
[8]  
GOTTLIEB N, 1992, J MED, P61
[9]   A SYSTEMATIC EFFORT TO REDUCE SMOKING AT THE WORKSITE [J].
GOTTLIEB, NH ;
NELSON, A .
HEALTH EDUCATION QUARTERLY, 1990, 17 (01) :99-118
[10]  
*HARV CTR CANC PRE, 1996, CANCER CAUSE CONTROL, V7, pS23