Likelihood ratio tests in behavioral genetics: Problems and solutions

被引:106
作者
Dominicus, A [1 ]
Skrondal, A
Gjessing, HK
Pedersen, NL
Palmgren, J
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med Epidemiol & Biostat, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Stockholm Univ, Dept Math, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] London Sch Econ, Dept Stat, London, England
[4] Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth, Div Epidemiol, Oslo, Norway
[5] Univ So Calif, Dept Psychol, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
关键词
boundary parameter; chi-square distribution; likelihood ratio test; twin model; variance component;
D O I
10.1007/s10519-005-9034-7
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The likelihood ratio test of nested models for family data plays an important role in the assessment of genetic and environmental influences on the variation in traits. The test is routinely based on the assumption that the test statistic follows a chi-square distribution under the null, with the number of restricted parameters as degrees of freedom. However, tests of variance components constrained to be non-negative correspond to tests of parameters on the boundary of the parameter space. In this situation the standard test procedure provides too large p-values and the use of the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) or the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) for model selection is problematic. Focusing on the classical ACE twin model for univariate traits, we adapt existing theory to show that the asymptotic distribution for the likelihood ratio statistic is a mixture of chi-square distributions, and we derive the mixing probabilities. We conclude that when testing the AE or the CE model against the ACE model, the p-values obtained from using the chi(2)(1 df) as the reference distribution should be halved. When the E model is tested against the ACE model, a mixture of chi(2)(0 df), chi(2)(1 df) and chi(2)(2 df) should be used as the reference distribution, and we provide a simple formula to compute the mixing probabilities. Similar results for tests of the AE, DE and E models against the ADE model are also derived. Failing to use the appropriate reference distribution can lead to invalid conclusions.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 340
页数:10
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   FACTOR-ANALYSIS AND AIC [J].
AKAIKE, H .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1987, 52 (03) :317-332
[2]   Comparison of multivariate tests for genetic linkage [J].
Amos, CI ;
de Andrade, M ;
Zhu, DK .
HUMAN HEREDITY, 2001, 51 (03) :133-144
[3]   Likelihood ratio tests in linear mixed models with one variance component [J].
Crainiceanu, CM ;
Ruppert, D .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2004, 66 :165-185
[4]  
Efron B., 1994, INTRO BOOTSTRAP, DOI DOI 10.1201/9780429246593
[5]   Processing speed and longitudinal trajectories of change for cognitive abilities: The Swedish Adoption/Twin Study of Aging [J].
Finkel, D ;
Pedersen, NL .
AGING NEUROPSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITION, 2004, 11 (2-3) :325-345
[6]  
Lehmann E.L., 1986, Testing Statistical Hypotheses
[7]  
Neale M.C., 1997, MX STAT MODELING, V3rd
[8]  
Neale M.C. C. L., 2013, METHODOLOGY GENETIC, V67
[9]   A QUANTITATIVE GENETIC-ANALYSIS OF COGNITIVE-ABILITIES DURING THE 2ND-HALF OF THE LIFE-SPAN [J].
PEDERSEN, NL ;
PLOMIN, R ;
NESSELROADE, JR ;
MCCLEARN, GE .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1992, 3 (06) :346-353
[10]  
R Development Core Team, 2003, R LANG ENV STAT COMP