Neuroradiologic Applications with Routine C-arm Flat Panel Detector CT: Evaluation of Patient Dose Measurements

被引:39
作者
Kyriakou, Y. [1 ]
Richter, G. [2 ]
Doerfler, A. [2 ]
Kalender, W. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Inst Med Phys, D-91052 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Neuroradiol, D-91052 Erlangen, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.3174/ajnr.A1237
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Since the introduction of flat panel detector-equipped C-arms, the use of flat panel detector CT (FPCT) in the neuroradiologic angiography suite has become more frequent. This examination implicates its own specific radiation exposure. We used the CT dose index (CTDI) concept and adapted it to the special FPCT geometry to provide a consistent comparison with multisection head CT (cCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Exposure data obtained for routine scanning during a period of 1 year were used to assess a specific dose of a total of 217 rotational scans performed in 105 patients. One hundred seventy-two scans were 3D digital subtraction angiography (DSA) scans. There were 45 scans that were performed to achieve high-quality, soft-tissue resolution. Dose measurements in cylindrical polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) phantoms were used to determine the CTDI value and to compare it with the reference values for cCT. In addition, the dose-area product (DAP) was registered and correlated with the CTDI and corresponding dose-length product (DLP) values. Exposure data and dose values were compared with cCT. RESULTS: Mean-weighted CTDI value of 3D-DSA was approximately 9 mGy per scan. High-quality, soft-tissue resolution FPCT scans, comparable with cCT, revealed a mean dose value of 75 mGy (reference value for cCT, CTDIw similar to 60 mGy). CONCLUSION: The high-speed scans used for 3D-DSA revealed a significantly lower CTDIw and DLP compared with clinical CT. The high-quality FPCT protocol resulted in a higher dose and should therefore be limited to acute cases, when patient transfer to a CT scanner is considered to be a disadvantage for patient management.
引用
收藏
页码:1930 / 1936
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] The trouble with CTDI100
    Boone, John M.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (04) : 1364 - 1371
  • [2] *BUND STRAHL, 2003, BUNDESANZEIGER, V143, P17503
  • [3] Intraoperative cone-beam CT for guidance of head and neck surgery: Assessment of dose and image quality using a C-arm prototype
    Daly, M. J.
    Siewerdsen, J. H.
    Moseley, D. J.
    Jaffray, D. A.
    Irish, J. C.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (10) : 3767 - 3780
  • [4] Validation of a Monte Carlo tool for patient-specific dose simulations in multi-slice computed tomography
    Deak, Paul
    van Straten, Marcel
    Shrimpton, Paul C.
    Zankl, Maria
    Kalender, Willi A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (04) : 759 - 772
  • [5] An improved analytical model for CT dose simulation with a new look at the theory of CT dose
    Dixon, RL
    Munley, MT
    Bayram, E
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (12) : 3712 - 3728
  • [6] Flat-panel detector volumetric CT for visualization of subarachnoid hemorrhage and ventricles: preliminary results compared to conventional CT
    Doelken, M.
    Struffert, T.
    Richter, G.
    Engelhorn, T.
    Nimsky, C.
    Ganslandt, O.
    Hammen, T.
    Doerfler, A.
    [J]. NEURORADIOLOGY, 2008, 50 (06) : 517 - 523
  • [7] Doerfler A, 2001, AM J NEURORADIOL, V22, P1825
  • [8] Myelography using flat panel volumetric computed tomography - A comparative study in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis
    Engelhorn, Tobias
    Rennert, Janine
    Richter, Gregor
    Struffert, Tobias
    Ganslandt, Oliver
    Doerfler, Arnd
    [J]. SPINE, 2007, 32 (18) : E523 - E527
  • [9] Dose and image quality for a cone-beam C-arm CT system
    Fahrig, Rebecca
    Dixon, Robert
    Payne, Thomas
    Morin, Richard L.
    Ganguly, Arundhuti
    Strobel, Norbert
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (12) : 4541 - 4550
  • [10] A performance comparison of flat-panel imager-based MV and kV cone-beam CT
    Groh, BA
    Siewerdsen, JH
    Drake, DG
    Wong, JW
    Jaffray, DA
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (06) : 967 - 975