Ability of a phase shift US contrast agent to improve imaging of the main renal arteries

被引:34
作者
Melany, ML
Grant, EG
Duerinckx, AJ
Watts, TM
Levine, BS
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF LOS ANGELES, DEPT INTERNAL MED, LOS ANGELES, CA 90073 USA
[2] W LOS ANGELES VET AFFAIRS MED CTR, DEPT RADIOL, LOS ANGELES, CA USA
[3] W LOS ANGELES VET AFFAIRS MED CTR, DEPT INTERNAL MED, LOS ANGELES, CA USA
关键词
ultrasound; (US); contrast media; Doppler studies; hypertension; renovascular; renal arteries; stenosis or obstruction;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.205.1.9314976
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of a phase shift contrast agent to improve Doppler sonographic imaging of the main renal arteries in cases of suspected renal artery stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 25 patients in whom renal artery stenosis was suspected, baseline Doppler sonography was performed followed by two studies performed after blinded administration of contrast material or placebo (saline). Each kidney (n = 45) was evaluated for (n) visualization of the main renal artery on a scale of 0-4, (b) presence of accessory renal arteries, and (c) direct Doppler sonographic findings suggestive of renal artery stenosis. Correlative magnetic resonance angiography was performed in 24 patients, and angiograms were obtained in eight kidneys with stenosis at one or both imaging studies. RESULTS: Contrast enhancement was observed in 23 patients. Enhancement was 8-20 minutes. Renal artery visualization scores improved from a mean of 2.56 and 2.71 on baseline and noncontrast scans, respectively, to 3.69 after administration of contrast material. Contrast-enhanced images depicted seven kidneys with accessory renal arteries not seen at other studies. Two of eight cases of stenosis were seen only with contrast-enhanced sonography. CONCLUSION: Use of the phase shift contrast agent appears to enable a reduction in the number of equivocal findings of renal artery stenosis.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 152
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   RENAL-ARTERY STENOSIS - PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF DIAGNOSIS WITH COLOR DUPLEX US COMPARED WITH ANGIOGRAPHY - WORK IN PROGRESS [J].
BERLAND, LL ;
KOSLIN, DB ;
ROUTH, WD ;
KELLER, FS .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 174 (02) :421-423
[2]   PULSUS TARDUS - ITS CAUSE AND POTENTIAL LIMITATIONS IN DETECTION OF ARTERIAL-STENOSIS [J].
BUDE, RO ;
RUBIN, JM ;
PLATT, JF ;
FECHNER, KP ;
ADLER, RS .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 190 (03) :779-784
[3]   NEWER TESTS FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF RENOVASCULAR DISEASE [J].
DAVIDSON, RA ;
WILCOX, CS .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 268 (23) :3353-3358
[4]   RENAL-ARTERY STENOSIS - EVALUATION WITH COLOR DOPPLER FLOW IMAGING [J].
DESBERG, AL ;
PAUSHTER, DM ;
LAMMERT, GK ;
HALE, JC ;
TROY, RB ;
NOVICK, AC ;
NALLY, JV ;
WELTEVREDEN, AM .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 177 (03) :749-753
[5]   PARENCHYMAL ENHANCEMENT AND TUMOR VISUALIZATION USING A NEW SONOGRAPHIC CONTRAST AGENT [J].
FORSBERG, F ;
LIU, JB ;
MERTON, DA ;
RAWOOL, NM ;
GOLDBERG, BB .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 1995, 14 (12) :949-957
[6]  
FORSBERG F, 1994, J ULTRAS MED, V13, P357
[7]   ECHO-DOPPLER VELOCIMETER IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS - THE RENAL-ARTERY DOPPLER TECHNIQUE [J].
HANDA, N ;
FUKUNAGA, R ;
UEHARA, A ;
ETANI, H ;
YONEDA, S ;
KIMURA, K ;
KAMADA, T .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1986, 12 (12) :945-952
[8]   RENAL-ARTERY STENOSIS - ANALYSIS OF DOPPLER WAVE-FORM PARAMETERS AND TARDUS-PARVUS PATTERN [J].
KLIEWER, MA ;
TUPLER, RH ;
CARROLL, BA ;
PAINE, SS ;
KRIEGSHAUSER, JS ;
HERTZBERG, BS ;
SVETKEY, LP .
RADIOLOGY, 1993, 189 (03) :779-787
[9]   DOPPLER EVALUATION OF RENAL-ARTERY STENOSIS - INTEROBSERVER AGREEMENT IN THE INTERPRETATION OF WAVE-FORM MORPHOLOGY [J].
KLIEWER, MA ;
TUPLER, RH ;
HERTZBERG, BS ;
PAINE, SS ;
DELONG, DM ;
SVETKEY, LP ;
CARROLL, BA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 162 (06) :1371-1376
[10]   NONINVASIVE DIAGNOSIS OF RENAL-ARTERY STENOSIS BY ULTRASONIC DUPLEX SCANNING [J].
KOHLER, TR ;
ZIERLER, RE ;
MARTIN, RL ;
NICHOLLS, SC ;
BERGELIN, RO ;
KAZMERS, A ;
BEACH, KW ;
STRANDNESS, DE .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1986, 4 (05) :450-456