DNA damage-processing pathways involved in the eukaryotic cellular response to anticancer DNA cross-linking drugs

被引:54
作者
Beljanski, V
Marzilli, LG
Doetsch, PW
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Biochem, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Dept Chem, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[3] Emory Univ, Div Canc Biol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[4] Emory Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[5] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Chem, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1124/mol.65.6.1496
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
We used a panel of isogenic Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains compromised in several different DNA damage-processing pathways to assess in vivo processing of DNA adducts induced by four cross-linking anticancer drugs. By examining cytotoxicity profiles, cell cycle arrest patterns, and determining recombination and mutation frequencies, we found that cisplatin-, nitrogen mustard-, mitomycin-, and carmustine-induced DNA adducts in S. cerevisiae are processed by components of the nucleotide excision repair (NER), recombination repair (RR), and translesion synthesis (TLS) pathways, with substantially different contributions of each pathway for the drugs studied here. In contrast to previous studies that used single pathway-compromised strains to identify genes that mediate sensitivity to DNA cross-linking drugs, we used strains that were compromised in multiple pathways. By doing so, we were able to establish several functions that were previously unknown and interconnections between different DNA damage-processing pathways. To our surprise, we found that for cisplatin- induced cytotoxicity, TLS and RR contribute to survival to a significant extent. In the case of nitrogen mustard DNA adduct processing, equal involvement of two major pathways was established: one that requires functional RR and NER components and one that requires functional TLS and NER components. These data reveal the complexity of DNA cross-link processing that, in many cases, requires interactions of components from several different DNA damage-processing systems. We demonstrate the usefulness of yeast strains with multiple simultaneous defects in DNA damage-processing pathways for studying the modes of action of anticancer drugs.
引用
收藏
页码:1496 / 1506
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   METHOD FOR TESTING FOR SYNERGY WITH ANY NUMBER OF AGENTS [J].
BERENBAUM, MC .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1978, 137 (02) :122-130
[2]   Modification of non-conservative double-strand break (DSB) rejoining activity after the induction of cisplatin resistance in human tumour cells [J].
Britten, RA ;
Kuny, S ;
Perdue, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1999, 79 (5-6) :843-849
[3]   QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS OF DOSE-EFFECT RELATIONSHIPS - THE COMBINED EFFECTS OF MULTIPLE-DRUGS OR ENZYME-INHIBITORS [J].
CHOU, TC ;
TALALAY, P .
ADVANCES IN ENZYME REGULATION, 1984, 22 :27-55
[4]  
Doetsch PW, 2001, PROG NUCLEIC ACID RE, V68, P29
[5]   Repair of DNA interstrand cross-links [J].
Dronkert, MLG ;
Kanaar, R .
MUTATION RESEARCH-DNA REPAIR, 2001, 486 (04) :217-247
[6]   Dependence on RAD52 and RAD1 for anticancer drug resistance mediated by inactivation of mismatch repair genes [J].
Durant, ST ;
Morris, MM ;
Illand, M ;
McKay, HJ ;
McCormick, C ;
Hirst, GL ;
Borts, RH ;
Brown, R .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 1999, 9 (01) :51-54
[7]   MUTAGENIC AND RECOMBINOGENIC CONSEQUENCES OF DNA-REPAIR INHIBITION DURING TREATMENT WITH 1,3-BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL)-1-NITROSOUREA IN SACCHAROMYCES-CEREVISIAE [J].
FERGUSON, LR .
MUTATION RESEARCH, 1990, 241 (04) :369-377
[8]  
FRIEDBERG EC, 1995, DNA REPAIR MUTAGENES
[9]   Cisplatin DNA cross-links do not inhibit S-phase and cause only a G2/M arrest in Saccharomyces cerevisiae [J].
Grossmann, KF ;
Brown, JC ;
Moses, RE .
MUTATION RESEARCH-DNA REPAIR, 1999, 434 (01) :29-39
[10]   Saccharomyces cerevisiae lacking Snm1, Rev3 or Rad51 have a normal S-phase but arrest permanently in G2 after cisplatin treatment [J].
Grossmann, KF ;
Ward, AM ;
Moses, RE .
MUTATION RESEARCH-DNA REPAIR, 2000, 461 (01) :1-13