Identification of drought-sensitive beech ecotypes by physiological parameters

被引:155
作者
Peuke, AD
Schraml, C
Hartung, W
Rennenberg, H
机构
[1] Inst Forstbot & Baumphysiol, D-79110 Freiburg, Germany
[2] Julius von Sachs Inst Biowissensch, D-97082 Wurzburg, Germany
关键词
beech (Fagus sylvatica); provenances; drought stress; water potential; transpiration; osmoprotectants; abscisic acid;
D O I
10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00400.x
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The effects of drought on European beech (Fagus sylvatica) were assessed in a pot experiment under controlled conditions. Plants from 11 autochthonous provenances originating from regions in Germany, which differed in annual precipitation, were exposed to a 3-wk drought period in a glasshouse after the first stage of shoot growth had been completed. Drought reduced the water content to 97% of control in leaves and axes and to 92% in the roots. A strong reduction of predawn water potential in roots and shoots, as well as on transpiration rate, was found. In the roots, the effect on water potential was the same for all provenances, but differences were observed in the shoot water potential. Leaf concentrations of abscisic acid (ABA), proline and sucrose increased in the drought-treated plants compared with the controls. Two extreme clusters from opposite climatic sites were identified by cluster analysis. A drought-sensitive cluster, originating from regions with high annual precipitation, had low water potential and transpiration rates, as well as high concentrations of fructose, ABA and proline after drought. Water potential and transpiration rates were less affected by drought in the other cluster, which comprised two provenances of relatively dry habitats, and concentrations of hexose, ABA and proline were low.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 387
页数:15
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Correlations of stomatal conductance with hydraulic and chemical factors in several deciduous tree species in a natural habitat [J].
Augé, RM ;
Green, CD ;
Stodola, AJW ;
Saxton, AM ;
Olinick, JB ;
Evans, RM .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2000, 145 (03) :483-500
[2]  
BOWES G, 1993, ANNU REV PLANT PHYS, V44, P309, DOI 10.1146/annurev.pp.44.060193.001521
[3]  
Bunce LA, 1999, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V106, P190, DOI 10.1034/j.1399-3054.1999.106207.x
[4]   Molecular and physiological responses to water deficit in drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive lines of sunflower -: Accumulation of dehydrin transcripts correlates with tolerance [J].
Cellier, F ;
Conéjéro, G ;
Breitler, JC ;
Casse, F .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 116 (01) :319-328
[5]  
ELLENBERG H, 1992, VEGETATION MITTELEUR
[6]  
*ENQ KOMM, 1994, SCHUTZ ERD DTSCH BUN
[7]  
Fort C, 1997, TREE PHYSIOL, V17, P281
[8]  
Fort C, 1998, TREE PHYSIOL, V18, P769
[9]   Drought affects the competitive interactions between Fagus sylvatica seedlings and an early successional species, Rubus fruticosus:: responses of growth, water status and δ13C composition [J].
Fotelli, MN ;
Gessler, A ;
Peuke, AD ;
Rennenberg, H .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2001, 151 (02) :427-435
[10]   Proline synthesis and degradation: a model system for elucidating stress-related signal transduction [J].
Hare, PD ;
Cress, WA ;
van Staden, J .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 1999, 50 (333) :413-434