Low-carbon transitions in world regions: comparison of technological mitigation potential and costs in 2020 and 2030 through bottom-up analyses

被引:18
作者
Hanaoka, Tatsuya [1 ]
Kainuma, Mikiko [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Environm Studies, Ctr Social & Environm Syst, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058506, Japan
关键词
Bottom-up analysis; Marginal abatement cost; Technological mitigation potential; Low-carbon transition; Model comparison; STABILIZATION; PATHWAY;
D O I
10.1007/s11625-012-0172-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study focuses on low-carbon transitions in the mid-term and analyzes mitigation potentials of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in 2020 and 2030 in a comparison based on bottom-up-type models. The study provides in-depth analyses of technological mitigation potentials and costs by sector and analyzes marginal abatement cost (MAC) curves from 0 to 200 US $/tCO(2) eq in major countries. An advantage of this study is that the technological feasibility of reducing GHG emissions is identified explicitly through looking at distinct technological options. However, the results of MAC curves using the bottom-up approach vary widely according to region and model due to the various differing assumptions. Thus, this study focuses on some comparable variables in order to analyze the differences between MAC curves. For example, reduction ratios relative to 2005 in Annex I range from 9 % to 31 % and 17 % to 34 % at 50 US $/tCO(2) eq in 2020 and 2030, respectively. In China and India, results of GHG emissions relative to 2005 vary very widely due to the difference in baseline emissions as well as the diffusion rate of mitigation technologies. Future portfolios of advanced technologies and energy resources, especially nuclear and renewable energies, are the most prominent reasons for the difference in MAC curves. Transitions toward a low-carbon society are not in line with current trends, and will require drastic GHG reductions, hence it is important to discuss how to overcome various existing barriers such as energy security constraints and technological restrictions.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 137
页数:21
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Technological feasibility and costs of achieving a 50 % reduction of global GHG emissions by 2050: mid- and long-term perspectives
    Akashi, Osamu
    Hanaoka, Tatsuya
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2012, 7 (02) : 139 - 156
  • [2] Akimoto K, 2012, SUSTAIN SCI IN PRESS
  • [3] Estimates of GHG emission reduction potential by country, sector, and cost
    Akimoto, Keigo
    Sano, Fuminori
    Homma, Takashi
    Oda, Junichiro
    Nagashima, Miyuki
    Kii, Masanobu
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (07) : 3384 - 3393
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2009, Pathway to a Low-Carbon Economy: Version 2 of the Global GHG Abatement Cost Curve
  • [5] [Anonymous], SECTORAL EMISSION MI
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2011, World Energy Outlook 2011
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2010, Energy Technology Perspectives 2010
  • [8] [Anonymous], 1991, WORKSH CO2 RED REM M
  • [9] International climate policy architectures: Overview of the EMF 22 International Scenarios
    Clarke, Leon
    Edmonds, Jae
    Krey, Volker
    Richels, Richard
    Rose, Steven
    Tavoni, Massimo
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2009, 31 : S64 - S81
  • [10] Den Elzen M, 2006, AVOIDING DANGEROUS C