Smokers' perceptions of smokeless tobacco and harm reduction

被引:19
作者
Sami, Mojgan [2 ]
Timberlake, David S. [1 ]
Nelson, Russ [3 ]
Goettsch, Brittany [1 ]
Ataian, Naeem [4 ]
Libao, Penney [1 ]
Vassile, Elanora [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Program Publ Hlth, Coll Hlth Sci, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Planning Policy & Design, Sch Social Ecol, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Program Management, Paul Merage Sch Business, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[4] Calif State Fullerton, Dept Sociol, Fullerton, CA USA
关键词
smokeless tobacco; harm reduction; tobacco control; qualitative domain analysis; PUBLIC-HEALTH; PRODUCTS; SNUS; NICOTINE; BELIEFS; SMOKING; SWEDEN;
D O I
10.1057/jphp.2012.9
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Existing survey data indicate that most smokers are not receptive to harm reduction incentives of switching to smokeless tobacco (SLT). Little is known about the underlying reasons for these views. To explore smokers' perceptions of SLT, we conducted a focus group (eight in total) study of daily smokers between 2009 and 2010 at the University of California, Irvine. We transcribed each 2-hour focus group verbatim and analyzed it using domain analysis. The discussions revealed several reasons why smokers are not receptive to SLT. First, smokers associated new spit-less SLT (that is, Snus) with historic images of chewing tobacco. Second, smokers viewed smoking as an incentive to take a break from their daily routine. Third, smokers expressed lack of control over nicotine delivery when using SLT, relative to cigarettes. These findings challenge tobacco manufacturers' strategies to market a smokeless alternative as a growing number of smoke-free policies are introduced. Journal of Public Health Policy (2012) 33, 188-201. doi:10.1057/jphp.2012.9; published online 1 March 2012
引用
收藏
页码:188 / 201
页数:14
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   European Union policy on smokeless tobacco:: a statement in favour of evidence based regulation for public health [J].
Bates, C ;
Fagerström, K ;
Jarvis, MJ ;
Kunze, M ;
McNeill, A ;
Ramström, L .
TOBACCO CONTROL, 2003, 12 (04) :360-367
[2]   Developing smokeless tobacco products for smokers: an examination of tobacco industry documents [J].
Carpenter, C. M. ;
Connolly, G. N. ;
Ayo-Yusuf, O. A. ;
Wayne, G. Ferris .
TOBACCO CONTROL, 2009, 18 (01) :54-59
[3]  
Connolly G.N., 1995, Tobacco Control, V4, P73
[4]   Effect of smokeless tobacco (snus) on smoking and public health in Sweden [J].
Foulds, J ;
Ramstrom, L ;
Burke, M ;
Fagerström, K .
TOBACCO CONTROL, 2003, 12 (04) :349-359
[5]   Should the health community promote smokeless tobacco (snus) as a harm reduction measure? [J].
Gartner, Coral E. ;
Hall, Wayne D. ;
Chapman, Simon ;
Freeman, Becky .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2007, 4 (07) :1138-1141
[6]   Swedish Match Company, Swedish snus and public health: a harm reduction experiment in progress? [J].
Henningfield, JE ;
Fagerstrom, KO .
TOBACCO CONTROL, 2001, 10 (03) :253-257
[7]  
Hoffmann D., 2001, RISKS ASS SMOKING CI
[8]   Not safe is not enough: smokers have a right to know more than there is no safe tobacco product [J].
Kozlowski, LT ;
Edwards, BQ .
TOBACCO CONTROL, 2005, 14 :II3-II7
[9]  
Kozlowski Lynn T, 2002, Nicotine Tob Res, V4 Suppl 2, pS55
[10]  
Kreuger R.A., 1988, FOCUS GROUPS QUALITA