Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation

被引:298
作者
Sedivy, JC [1 ]
Tanenhaus, MK
Chambers, CG
Carlson, GN
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Dept Cognit & Linguist Sci, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[2] Univ Rochester, Rochester, NY USA
关键词
language processing; semantic interpretation; prenominal adjectives;
D O I
10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00025-6
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
While much work has been done investigating the role of context in the incremental processing of syntactic indeterminacies, relatively little is known about online semantic interpretation. The experiments in this article made use of the eye-tracking paradigm with spoken language and visual contexts in order to examine how, and when listeners make use of contextually-defined contrast in interpreting simple prenominal adjectives. Experiment 1 focused on intersective adjectives. Experiment 1A provided further evidence that intersective adjectives are processed incrementally. Experiment 1B compared response times to follow instructions such as 'Pick up the blue comb' under conditions where there were two blue objects (e.g. a blue pen and a blue comb), but only one of those objects had a contrasting member in the display. Responses were faster to objects with a contrasting member, establishing that the listeners initially assume a contrastive interpretation for intersective adjectives. Experiments 2 and 3 focused on vague scalar adjectives examining the time course with which listeners establish contrast for scalar adjectives such as roll using information provided by the head noun (e.g. glass) and information provided by the visual context. Use of head-based information was examined by manipulating the typicality of the target object (e.g. whether it was a good or poor example of a tall gloss. Use of context-dependent contrast was examined by either having only a single glass in the display (the Ilo contrast condition) or a contrasting object (e.g. a smaller glass). The pattern of results indicated that listeners interpreted the scalar adjective incrementally taking into account context-specific contrast prior to encountering the head. Moreover, the presence of a contrasting object, sharply I educed. and in some conditions completely eliminated, typicality effects. The results suggest a language processing system in which semantic interpretation, as well as syntactic processing, is conducted incrementally, with early integration of contextual information. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 147
页数:39
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   INTERACTION WITH CONTEXT DURING HUMAN SENTENCE PROCESSING [J].
ALTMANN, G ;
STEEDMAN, M .
COGNITION, 1988, 30 (03) :191-238
[2]   EFFECTS OF SYNTAX IN HUMAN SENTENCE PARSING - EVIDENCE AGAINST A STRUCTURE-BASED PROPOSAL MECHANISM [J].
ALTMANN, GTM ;
GARNHAM, A ;
HENSTRA, J .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1994, 20 (01) :209-216
[3]   AVOIDING THE GARDEN PATH - EYE-MOVEMENTS IN CONTEXT [J].
ALTMANN, GTM ;
GARNHAM, A ;
DENNIS, Y .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1992, 31 (05) :685-712
[4]  
[Anonymous], PERSPECTIVES SENTENC
[5]  
Bierwisch M., 1987, DIMENSIONAL ADJECTIV
[6]   THE INTERACTION OF REFERENTIAL AMBIGUITY AND ARGUMENT STRUCTURE IN THE PARSING OF PREPOSITIONAL PHRASES [J].
BRITT, MA .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1994, 33 (02) :251-283
[7]  
CARROLL J, 1978, HDB PERCEPTION, V7
[8]   Ambiguity in Context [J].
Clifton, Charles, Jr. ;
Ferreira, Fernanda .
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 1989, 4 (3-4) :SI77-SI103
[9]  
Crain S., 1985, Natural language parsing
[10]   EYE-MOVEMENTS AS A WINDOW INTO REAL-TIME SPOKEN LANGUAGE COMPREHENSION IN NATURAL CONTEXTS [J].
EBERHARD, KM ;
SPIVEYKNOWLTON, MJ ;
SEDIVY, JC ;
TANENHAUS, MK .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 1995, 24 (06) :409-436