Reducing rumen methane emissions through elimination of rumen protozoa

被引:153
作者
Hegarty, RS [1 ]
机构
[1] NSW Agr, Beef Ind Ctr, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
来源
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH | 1999年 / 50卷 / 08期
关键词
ciliates; methanogens; symbiosis; ruminal; defaunation; hydrogen;
D O I
10.1071/AR99008
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Methanogens living on and within rumen ciliate protozoa may be responsible for up to 37% of the rumen methane emissions. In the absence of protozoa, rumen methane emissions are reduced by an average of 13% but this varies with diet. Decreased methane emissions from the protozoa-free rumen may be a consequence of: (1) reduced ruminal dry matter digestion; (2) a decreased methanogen population; (3) an altered pattern of volatile fatty acid production and hydrogen availability; or (4) increased partial pressure of oxygen in the rumen. The decline in methanogenesis associated with removal of protozoa is greatest on high concentrate diets and this is in keeping with protozoa being relatively more important sources of hydrogen on starch diets, because many starch-fermenting bacteria do not produce H-2. Because protozoa also decrease the supply of protein available to the host animal, their elimination offers benefits in both decreasing greenhouse gas emissions and potentially increasing livestock production. Strategies for eliminating protozoa are reviewed. None of the available techniques is considered practical for commercial application and this should be addressed.
引用
收藏
页码:1321 / 1327
页数:7
相关论文
共 92 条
[1]  
ABE M, 1989, Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, V2, P487
[2]   SIMPLE METHOD TO REMOVE COMPLETELY CILIATE PROTOZOA OF ADULT RUMINANTS [J].
AKKADA, ARA ;
BARTLEY, EE ;
BERUBE, R ;
FINA, LR ;
MEYER, RM ;
HENRICKS, D ;
JULIUS, F .
APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 1968, 16 (10) :1475-&
[3]   INFLUENCE OF THE PRESENCE OF PROTOZOA ON THE RUMEN MICROBIAL-POPULATION OF CATTLE [J].
ARAKAKI, C ;
MITSUMORI, M ;
ITABASHI, H ;
SHIRASAKA, S ;
MINATO, H .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL AND APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 1994, 40 (03) :215-226
[4]  
Becker ER, 1930, AM J HYG, V11, P362
[5]  
Bird S., 1998, Animal Production in Australia. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production, V22, P391
[6]  
Bird S. H., 1985, Reviews in Rural Science, P109
[7]  
Bird S. H., 1991, Recent advances in animal nutrition in Australia 1991., P15
[8]   OBSERVATIONS ON THE RUMINAL MICROORGANISMS OF ISOLATED AND INOCULATED CALVES [J].
BRYANT, MP ;
SMALL, N .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1960, 43 (05) :654-667
[9]   ANTI-PROTOZOAL EFFECTS OF SURFACTANT DETERGENTS IN THE RUMEN OF SHEEP [J].
BURGGRAAF, W ;
LENG, RA .
NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1980, 23 (03) :287-291
[10]  
CHAUDHARY LC, 1997, AGR REV KARNAL, V14, P191