Standards for statistical models used for public reporting of health outcomes - An American Heart Association scientific statement from the quality of care and outcomes research interdisciplinary writing group - Cosponsored by the Council on Epidemiology and Prevention and the Stroke Council - Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation

被引:282
作者
Krumholz, HM
Brindis, RG
Brush, JE
Cohen, DJ
Epstein, AJ
Furie, K
Howard, G
Peterson, ED
Rathore, SS
Smith, SC
Spertus, JA
Wang, Y
Normand, SLT
机构
[1] Cardiology Consultants, Ltd.
[2] University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL
[3] University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
关键词
AHA Scientific Statements; risk adjustment; risk assessment; quality of health care; quality indicators;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.170769
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
With the proliferation of efforts to report publicly the outcomes of healthcare providers and institutions, there is a growing need to define standards for the methods that are being employed. An interdisciplinary writing group identified 7 preferred attributes of statistical models used for publicly reported outcomes. These attributes include (1) clear and explicit definition of an appropriate patient sample, (2) clinical coherence of model variables, (3) sufficiently high-quality and timely data, (4) designation of an appropriate reference time before which covariates are derived and after which outcomes are measured, (5) use of an appropriate outcome and a standardized period of outcome assessment, (6) application of an analytical approach that takes into account the multilevel organization of data, and (7) disclosure of the methods used to compare outcomes, including disclosure of performance of risk-adjustment methodology in derivation and validation samples.
引用
收藏
页码:456 / 462
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SPEC MAN NAT HOSP QU
[2]  
[Anonymous], U.S. News and World Report. Media Kit
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, HIERARCHAL LINEAR MO
[4]   Accuracy of ICD-9-CM codes for identifying cardiovascular and stroke risk factors [J].
Birman-Deych, E ;
Waterman, AD ;
Yan, Y ;
Nilasena, DS ;
Radford, MJ ;
Gage, BF .
MEDICAL CARE, 2005, 43 (05) :480-485
[5]  
*CAL OFF STAT HLTH, HEALTHC OUTC CLIN DA
[6]   THE RISK OF DETERMINING RISK WITH MULTIVARIABLE MODELS [J].
CONCATO, J ;
FEINSTEIN, AR ;
HOLFORD, TR .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1993, 118 (03) :201-210
[7]  
DALEY J, 2003, CONCEPTUAL PRACTICAL
[8]   Hierarchical generalized linear models in the analysis of variations in health care utilization [J].
Daniels, MJ ;
Gatsonis, C .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 94 (445) :29-42
[9]  
*DEP HLTH HUM SERV, 1989, DHHS PUBL
[10]   THE QUALITY OF CARE - HOW CAN IT BE ASSESSED [J].
DONABEDIAN, A .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1988, 260 (12) :1743-1748