Posttreatment of effluent from coke-plant wastewater treatment system in sequencing batch reactors

被引:42
作者
Yu, HQ [1 ]
Gu, GW [1 ]
Song, LP [1 ]
机构
[1] TONGJI UNIV,SCH ENVIRONM ENGN,SHANGHAI 200092,PEOPLES R CHINA
来源
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE | 1997年 / 123卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1997)123:3(305)
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The performance of sequencing batch reactors (SBRs) for the treatment of effluent from a conventional coke-plant wastewater biological treatment system has been evaluated. The results showed that an operating mode that incorporated two anoxic portions, one ahead of the aeration period and one after the aeration, was superior to the other modes (prearranged denitrification and postarranged denitrification) for nitrogen removal. The 4-h anoxic fill probably allowed some substrates in the influent to be stored in the biomass and led to subsequent storage-induced denitrification in the second anoxic portion during the reaction period. Under these conditions, the ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) reductions were 82.5 and 65.2%, respectively. During the fill period of an SBR, the organics concentration was reduced, probably due to the adsorption of organics onto activated sludge and dilution of the mixed liquor. Some readily biodegradable organics in the influent, such as phenol and o-cresol, were utilized by denitrifiers as a carbon source. A 16-h aeration significantly reduced the concentrations of o-cresol, 3,4-dimethyl phenol, and 2-quinoline alcohol, while reductions in quinoline, isoquinoline, indol, and methyl quinoline were limited.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 308
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   STORAGE-INDUCED DENITRIFICATION USING SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR OPERATION [J].
ALLEMAN, JE ;
IRVINE, RL .
WATER RESEARCH, 1980, 14 (10) :1483-1488
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, STAND METH EX WAT WA
[3]  
[Anonymous], CRIT REV ENV CONTR
[4]   TREATMENT OF A HIGH-STRENGTH, MIXED PHENOLIC WASTE IN AN SBR [J].
BRENNER, A ;
CHOZICK, R ;
IRVINE, RL .
WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 1992, 64 (02) :128-133
[5]  
GANCZARCZYK JJ, 1980, P 35 IND WAST C W LA, P325
[6]  
HERZBRUN PA, 1985, J WATER POLLUT CON F, V57, P1163
[7]  
IRVINE RL, 1979, J WATER POLLUT CON F, V51, P235
[8]  
LUTHY RG, 1983, J WATER POLLUT CON F, V55, P196
[9]  
Mecler H., 1984, J WATER POLLUTION CO, V56, P192
[10]  
NG WJ, 1989, SEQUENCING BATCH REC