WHICH PROBLEMS TO SOLVE? ONLINE KNOWLEDGE SHARING AND ATTENTION ALLOCATION IN ORGANIZATIONS

被引:180
作者
Haas, Martine R. [1 ]
Criscuolo, Paola [2 ]
George, Gerard [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Management, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Business School, Innovat Management, London SW7 2AZ, England
[3] Singapore Management Univ, Lee Kong Chian Sch Business, Innovat & Entrepreneurship, Singapore 178902, Singapore
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; WEAK TIES; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; VIRTUAL COMMUNITIES; ALLIANCE FORMATION; NETWORK STRUCTURE; MATCHING THEORY; MODEL; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.5465/amj.2013.0263
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Why do individuals allocate attention to specific problems in organizations? Viewing online knowledge sharing as a matching process between knowledge providers and problems, we examine attention allocation in the context of an online community within which knowledge providers respond to problems posted by other organization members. We argue that knowledge providers are more likely to allocate attention to solving problems that more closely match their expertise, but that decisions to allocate attention are also influenced by problem characteristics such as length, breadth, and novelty, as well as by problem crowding. Analyzing 1,251 realized matches and 12,510 nonrealized matches among knowledge providers and problems posted over a 32-month period on an online discussion forum within a global engineering firm, we find evidence to support our claim that attention allocation is driven by the features of a particular provider-problem match, thereby shifting the discourse from knowledge provider-seeker relationships to knowledge provider-problem matches. The implications for theories of knowledge sharing, matching processes, and managerial attention are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:680 / 711
页数:32
相关论文
共 126 条
[1]   Network structure in virtual organizations [J].
Ahuja, MK ;
Carley, KM .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (06) :741-757
[2]   Individual centrality and performance in virtual R&D groups: An empirical study [J].
Ahuja, MK ;
Galletta, DF ;
Carley, KM .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2003, 49 (01) :21-38
[3]  
Aiken L. S., 1991, Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions
[4]  
Allen T. J., 1977, Managing the flow of technology: Technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information within the RD organization
[5]  
[Anonymous], J STAT SOFTWARE
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1985, FRAMES MIND THEORY M
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1979, INF PROCESS RES ADVE
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1973, PATTERN RECOGNITION
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2012, The social economy: Unlocking value and productivity through social technologies. Retrieved from