Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with difference scores

被引:100
作者
Jamieson, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Lakehead Univ, Dept Psychol, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada
关键词
analysis of covariance (ANCOVA); difference scores; change; measurement error;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2003.12.009
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 [教育学]; 0402 [心理学];
摘要
When comparing pretest to posttest changes in non-randomized groups, most researchers are correctly avoiding ANCOVA with posttest as the dependent variable and pretest as the covariate. However, there is a widespread use of ANCOVA in which the difference score (posttest minus pretest) is used as the dependent variable, and pretest as the covariate. A computer simulation study is presented which shows that measurement error causes identical, biased conclusions when comparing changes using either the posttest score or the posttest minus pretest difference score as the dependent variable. The reasons for this bias are explained and illustrated. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 283
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]
A COMPARISON OF ANALYSIS OF COVARIANCE TO WITHIN-CLASS REGRESSION IN THE ANALYSIS OF NON-EQUIVALENT GROUPS [J].
BALDWIN, L ;
MEDLEY, DM ;
MACDOUGALL, MA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION, 1984, 52 (02) :68-76
[2]
Cohen J., 1983, APPL MULTIPLE REGRES, DOI [10.1002/0471264385.wei0219, DOI 10.1002/0471264385.WEI0219]
[3]
Is reliability obsolete? Are simple gain scores obsolete? A commentary [J].
Collins, LM .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1996, 20 (03) :289-292
[4]
Structural equation models and the regression bias for measuring correlates of change [J].
Cribbie, RA ;
Jamieson, J .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2000, 60 (06) :893-907
[5]
CRIBBIE RA, UNPUB DECREASES POST
[6]
HOW WE SHOULD MEASURE CHANGE - OR SHOULD WE [J].
CRONBACH, LJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1970, 74 (01) :68-80
[7]
HUITERMA BE, 1980, ANAL COVARIANCE ALTE
[9]
THE RELIABILITY AND SPECIFICITY OF DELTA VERSUS RESIDUALIZED CHANGE AS MEASURES OF CARDIOVASCULAR REACTIVITY TO BEHAVIORAL CHALLENGES [J].
LLABRE, MM ;
SPITZER, SB ;
SAAB, PG ;
IRONSON, GH ;
SCHNEIDERMAN, N .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 28 (06) :701-711
[10]
A PARADOX IN INTERPRETATION OF GROUP COMPARISONS [J].
LORD, FM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1967, 68 (05) :304-&