Why conventional tools for policy analysis are often inadequate for problems of global change - An editorial essay

被引:56
作者
Morgan, MG [1 ]
Kandlikar, M [1 ]
Risbey, J [1 ]
Dowlatabadi, H [1 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Engn & Publ Policy, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1023/A:1005469411776
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 281
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MANAGING GLOBAL COMM
[2]  
AXTELL RL, 1992, THEORY MODEL AGGREGA
[3]   MANAGING THE RISK OF GLOBAL CLIMATE CATASTROPHE - AN UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS [J].
CHAO, HP .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1995, 15 (01) :69-78
[4]  
CRONON W, 1983, CHANGES LAND INDIANS, P241
[5]   INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT OF CLIMATE CHANGE [J].
DOWLATABADI, H ;
MORGAN, MG .
SCIENCE, 1993, 259 (5103) :1813-&
[6]  
FANKHAUSER S, 1994, ENERGY J, V15, P157
[7]   VALUE ELICITATION - IS THERE ANYTHING IN THERE [J].
FISCHHOFF, B .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1991, 46 (08) :835-847
[8]  
GRAHAM J, 1980, RISK ANAL, V1, P89
[9]  
HOWARD RA, 1980, SOC RISK ASSESSMENT, P363
[10]  
KAHNEMAN D, 1979, ECONOMETRICA, V47, P363