Effects of Energy Restriction and Exercise on Bone Mineral Density during Lactation

被引:20
作者
Colleran, Heather L. [1 ]
Wideman, Laurie [2 ]
Lovelady, Cheryl A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Nutr, Greensboro, NC 27402 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Kinesiol, Greensboro, NC 27402 USA
关键词
DIET; BREAST-FEEDING; POSTPARTUM WEIGHT LOSS; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; WEIGHT-LOSS; GROWTH-HORMONE; AEROBIC EXERCISE; POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; RESISTANCE EXERCISE; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; PREGNANCY; OVERWEIGHT; CALCIUM; OBESITY;
D O I
10.1249/MSS.0b013e318251d43e
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
040301 [体育人文社会学];
摘要
COLLERAN, H. L., L. WIDEMAN, and C. A. LOVELADY. Effects of Energy Restriction and Exercise on Bone Mineral Density during Lactation. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 44, No. 8, pp. 1570-1579, 2012. Modest energy restriction combined with resistance training (RT) has been shown in nonlactating women to protect bone during periods of weight loss. However, there is a paucity of research on dietary interventions and exercise in lactating women aimed at promoting bone health and weight loss. Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the effects of energy restriction and exercise on bone mineral density (BMD) and hormones during lactation. Methods: At 4 wk postpartum, participants were randomized to either a 16-wk intervention (diet restricted by 500 kcal and RT 3 d(.)wk(-1)) group (IG = 14) or minimal care group (CG = 13). Measurements included BMD by DXA, three 24-h dietary recalls, and hormones. Repeated-measures ANOVA was used to test for group differences over time. Results: Energy intake decreased more in IG (613 +/- 521 kcal) than CG (171 +/- 435 kcal) (P = 0.03). IG lost more weight (5.8 +/- 3.5 kg vs CG = 1.6 +/- 5.4 kg, P = 0.02). BMD decreased over time, P < 0.01, with no group differences in lumbar spine (IG = 3.4% +/- 2.5%, CG = 3.7% +/- 3.3%) or hip (IG and CG = 3.1 +/- 1.8%). Prolactin and estradiol decreased over time in both groups, P < 0.01. Basal growth hormone remained stable; however, there was a significant increase in growth hormone response to exercise in IG. Conclusions: These results suggest that moderate energy restriction combined with RT promotes weight loss with no adverse effects on BMD during lactation.
引用
收藏
页码:1570 / 1579
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]
American Heart Association, EAT LESS NUTR POOR F
[2]
[Anonymous], 2005, Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein, and amino acids (macronutrients), P107
[3]
[Anonymous], 2006, ACSM'S Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, P60
[4]
The association between body mass index and osteoporosis in patients referred for a bone mineral density examination [J].
Asomaning, Kofi ;
Bertone-Johnson, Elizabeth R. ;
Nasca, Philip C. ;
Hooven, Frederick ;
Pekow, Penelope S. .
JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2006, 15 (09) :1028-1034
[5]
Substrate utilization and hormonal responses to moderate intensity exercise during pregnancy and after delivery [J].
Bessinger, RC ;
McMurray, RG ;
Hackney, AC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 186 (04) :757-764
[6]
The USDA automated multiple-pass method accurately estimates group total energy and nutrient intake [J].
Blanton, Cynthia A. ;
Moshfegh, Alanna J. ;
Baer, David J. ;
Kretsch, Mary J. .
JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2006, 136 (10) :2594-2599
[7]
Compromised Bone Health in Non-Obese, Older Women with Low Caloric Intake [J].
Caporaso, Fredric ;
Frisch, Frank ;
Sumida, Ken D. .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2011, 36 (04) :559-564
[8]
Endogenous anabolic hormone responses to endurance versus resistance exercise and training in women [J].
Consitt, LA ;
Copeland, JL ;
Tremblay, MS .
SPORTS MEDICINE, 2002, 32 (01) :1-22
[9]
Prevalence and Trends in Obesity Among US Adults, 1999-2008 [J].
Flegal, Katherine M. ;
Carroll, Margaret D. ;
Ogden, Cynthia L. ;
Curtin, Lester R. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 303 (03) :235-241
[10]
Effects of calcium supplementation on calcium homeostasis and bone turnover in lactating women [J].
Kalkwarf, HJ ;
Specker, BL ;
Ho, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 1999, 84 (02) :464-470