Renal artery stenosis evaluated with 3D-Gd-magnetic resonance angiography using transstenotic pressure gradient as the standard of reference.: A multireader study

被引:10
作者
Eklöf, H
Ahlstrom, H
Bostrom, A
Bergqvist, D
Andrén, B
Karacagil, S
Nyman, R
机构
[1] Akad Sjukhuset, Dept Radiol, SE-75185 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Akad Sjukhuset, Dept Surg, SE-75185 Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Akad Sjukhuset, Dept Clin Physiol, SE-75185 Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1080/02841850500335010
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate 3D-Gd-magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in detecting hemodynamically significant renal artery stenosis (RAS). Material and Methods: Thirty patients evaluated for atherosclerotic RAS by MRA and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) were retrospectively included. Standard of reference for hemodynamically significant RAS was a transstenotic gradient of 15 mmHg. DSA visualized 60 main renal arteries and 9 accessory arteries. Pressure gradient measurement (PGM) was available from 61 arteries. Three radiologists evaluated all examinations independently in a blinded fashion. Results: RAS was present in 26 arteries. On MRA, each reader identified 4 of 9 accessory renal arteries, a detection rate of 44%. The three readers correctly classified 22/25/22 of the 26 vessels with a significant gradient as >= 60% RAS and 31/25/32 of the 35 with no significant gradient as < 60% RAS on MRA. Interobserver agreement was substantial. MRA image quality was adequate for RAS evaluations in all patients. ROC curves indicated that MRA is an adequate method for evaluating RAS. When screening for RAS, a 50% diameter reduction cut-off is better than 60%. RAS with 40-80% diameter reductions accounted for 65% of discrepancies. Conclusion: MRA is an adequate method for evaluating RAS limited mainly by poor detection rate for accessory renal arteries.
引用
收藏
页码:802 / 809
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
BERGQVIST D, 1987, ACTA RADIOL, V28, P3
[2]  
Bland M., 2000, INTRO MED STAT
[3]  
BOIJSEN E, 1959, Acta Radiol Suppl, V183, P1
[4]   Trends in adverse events after IV administration of contrast media [J].
Cochran, ST ;
Bomyea, K ;
Sayre, JW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 176 (06) :1385-1388
[5]   THRESHOLD PRESSURE FOR THE PRESSURE-DEPENDENT RENIN RELEASE IN THE AUTOREGULATING KIDNEY OF CONSCIOUS DOGS [J].
FINKE, R ;
GROSS, R ;
HACKENTHAL, E ;
HUBER, J ;
KIRCHHEIM, HR .
PFLUGERS ARCHIV-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1983, 399 (02) :102-110
[6]  
Fleiss J. L., 1981, Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, V2nd
[7]   Determination of renal arterial stenosis severity:: Comparison of pressure gradient and vessel diameter [J].
Gross, CM ;
Krämer, J ;
Weingärtner, O ;
Uhlich, F ;
Luft, FC ;
Waigand, J ;
Dietz, R .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 220 (03) :751-756
[8]   NONINVASIVE DIAGNOSIS OF RENAL-ARTERY STENOSIS BY ULTRASONIC DUPLEX SCANNING [J].
KOHLER, TR ;
ZIERLER, RE ;
MARTIN, RL ;
NICHOLLS, SC ;
BERGELIN, RO ;
KAZMERS, A ;
BEACH, KW ;
STRANDNESS, DE .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1986, 4 (05) :450-456
[9]   MEASUREMENT OF OBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR CATEGORICAL DATA [J].
LANDIS, JR ;
KOCH, GG .
BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (01) :159-174
[10]   DETERMINANTS OF TRANSSTENOTIC GRADIENTS OBSERVED DURING ANGIOPLASTY - AN EXPERIMENTAL-MODEL [J].
LEIBOFF, R ;
BREN, G ;
KATZ, R ;
KORKEGI, R ;
ROSS, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1983, 52 (10) :1311-1317