Vegetative production of kenaf and canola under irrigation in central California

被引:56
作者
Bañuelos, GS
Bryla, DR
Cook, CG
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Water Management Res Lab, Parlier, CA 93648 USA
[2] Syngenta Seeds Inc, Victoria, TX 77905 USA
关键词
kenaf; canola; irrigation; vegetative growth; evapotranspiration;
D O I
10.1016/S0926-6690(01)00119-4
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) and canola (Brassica napus L.) are potential alternative crops for forage production and phytoremediation adaptable to irrigated agriculture in central California. However, little information is available on the water requirements for growing these crops under irrigated conditions, particularly with regard to increasing their vegetative growth. A 3-year field study was undertaken to evaluate kenaf (cultivars: 7-N, Everglades-41, Tainung-2 and breeding lines: C-531, C-533) and one variety of canola (Westar) for potential cultivation. Kenaf was grown as a spring crop and canola was grown as a fall crop. Plants were irrigated at five different levels, ranging from 368 to 1413 mm for kenaf and from 62 to 359 mm for canola per growing season. For kenaf, shoot and root dry matter (DM) production increased as irrigation was increased incrementally from 25 to 125% crop evapotranspiration (Etc); water application at 150% Etc had no increased benefit. Bark:core ratio of the various kenaf cultivars, however, was unaffected by the level of irrigation. For canola, shoot DM and leaf:stem ratio increased with irrigation up to 125% Et, whereas root DM did not differ significantly among irrigation treatments. Kenaf produced at least twice as much biomass as canola and both crops produced maximum vegetative yields at 100-125% Et-c in central California. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 245
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
*ALB AGR, 1980, IRR CAN PROD
[2]  
ANSELIN L., 1988, SPATIAL ECONOMETRICS
[3]   Evaluation of different plant species used for phytoremediation of high soil selenium [J].
Banuelos, GS ;
Ajwa, HA ;
Mackey, B ;
Wu, L ;
Cook, C ;
Akohoue, S ;
Zambruzuski, S .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1997, 26 (03) :639-646
[4]   EFFECT OF PLANTING DATE, NITROGEN LEVELS, ROW SPACING, AND PLANT-POPULATION ON KENAF PERFORMANCE IN THE SAN-JOAQUIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA [J].
BHANGOO, MS ;
TEHRANI, HS ;
HENDERSON, J .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1986, 78 (04) :600-604
[5]  
BHANGOO MS, 1991, AGR TECHNOLOGY I CAL
[6]  
BHANGOO MS, 1995, P INT KEN ASS 7 ANN, P149
[7]  
BHARDWAJ HL, 1995, P INT KEN ASS 7 ANN, P95
[8]   Water stress effects on rapeseed quality [J].
Bouchereau, A ;
ClossaisBesnard, N ;
Bensaoud, A ;
Leport, L ;
Renard, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 1996, 5 (1-2) :19-30
[9]   Effects of water stress applied at different growth stages to Brassica napus L var oleifera on yield, yield components and seed quality [J].
Champolivier, L ;
Merrien, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 1996, 5 (3-4) :153-160
[10]   GROWTH ANALYSIS OF BRASSICA-NAPUS CV TOWER [J].
CLARKE, JM ;
SIMPSON, GM .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 1978, 58 (03) :587-595