Results of photopatch testing in Rotterdam during a 10-year period

被引:23
作者
Bakkum, RSLA [1 ]
Heule, F [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rotterdam Hosp, Dept Dermatol & Venereol, NL-3015 GD Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
photocontact allergens; photocontact dermatitis; photopatch testing; standardization; sunscreen agents;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2133.2002.04578.x
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background Photoallergic contact dermatitis is of importance in a proportion of photodermatoses and can be evaluated through photopatch testing. Objectives To conduct a retrospective evaluation of photopatch tests performed in patients with suspected photodermatoses at the clinic at the University Hospital Rotterdam during a 10-year period. Methods During the first 5% years 44 patients were tested with a standard set of 14 allergens, and during the next 4% years 55 patients were tested with a standard set of 23 allergens. Results Photocontact reactions were found in 9% and 27% of patients in the two periods, respectively. In the second period, positive reactions were mostly produced by sunscreens. The difference in the percentage of positive photopatch tests was probably caused by the difference in composition of the standard set of allergens (more sunscreens in the second period), this being the only alteration in the test procedure. Conclusions The standard set of photoallergens has to be updated periodically. Standardization of the test procedure is needed to compare the test results of different institutions.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 279
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Berne B, 1998, CONTACT DERMATITIS, V38, P61
[2]   CONTACT ALLERGY TO BUTYL METHOXYDIBENZOYLMETHANE [J].
DEGROOT, AC ;
WEYLAND, JW .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1987, 16 (05) :278-278
[3]   PHOTOALLERGIC CONTACT-DERMATITIS - RESULTS OF PHOTOPATCH TESTING IN NEW-YORK, 1985 TO 1990 [J].
DELEO, VA ;
SUAREZ, SM ;
MASO, MJ .
ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 1992, 128 (11) :1513-1518
[4]   SUNSCREENING AGENT INTOLERANCE - CONTACT AND PHOTOCONTACT SENSITIZATION AND CONTACT URTICARIA [J].
DROMGOOLE, SH ;
MAIBACH, HI .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1990, 22 (06) :1068-1078
[5]   RESULTS OF EVALUATION OF 203 PATIENTS FOR PHOTOSENSITIVITY IN A 7.3-YEAR PERIOD [J].
FOTIADES, J ;
SOTER, NA ;
LIM, HW .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1995, 33 (04) :597-602
[6]   CONTACT AND PHOTOCONTACT SENSITIVITY TO SUNSCREENS [J].
GONCALO, M ;
RUAS, E ;
FIGUEIREDO, A ;
GONCALO, S .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1995, 33 (04) :278-280
[7]   Photopatch test reactivity: Effect of photoallergen concentration and UVA dosaging [J].
Hasan, T ;
Jansen, CT .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1996, 34 (06) :383-386
[8]   PHOTOPATCH TESTING - THE 5-YEAR EXPERIENCE OF THE GERMAN, AUSTRIAN, AND SWISS PHOTOPATCH TEST GROUP [J].
HOLZLE, E ;
NEUMANN, N ;
HAUSEN, B ;
PRZYBILLA, B ;
SCHAUDER, S ;
HONIGSMANN, H ;
BIRCHER, A ;
PLEWIG, G .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1991, 25 (01) :59-68
[9]  
Journe F, 1999, ACTA DERM-VENEREOL, V79, P211
[10]   CONTACT AND PHOTOCONTACT ALLERGY TO OXYBENZONE [J].
LENIQUE, P ;
MACHET, L ;
VAILLANT, L ;
BENSAID, P ;
MULLER, C ;
KHALLOUF, R ;
LORETTE, G .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1992, 26 (03) :177-181