Object name learning provides on-the-job training for attention

被引:330
作者
Smith, LB
Jones, SS
Landau, B
Gershkoff-Stowe, L
Samuelson, L
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Dept Psychol, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[2] Univ Delaware, Newark, DE 19716 USA
[3] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[4] Univ Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1467-9280.00403
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
By the age of 3, children easily learn to name new objects, extending new names for unfamiliar objects by similarity in shape. Two experiments tested the proposal that experience in learning object names tunes children's attention to the properties relevant for naming-in the present case, to the proper v (of shape-and thus facilitates the learning of more object names. In Experiment 1, a 9-week longitudinal study, 17-month-old children who repeatedly played with and heard names for members of unfamiliar object categories well organized by shape formed the generalization that only objects with similar shapes have the same name. Trained children also showed a dramatic increase in acquisition of new object names outside of the laboratory during the course of the study. Experiment 2 replicated these findings and showed that they depended on children's learning both a coherent category structure and object names. Thus, children who learn specific names for specific things in categories with a common organizing property-in this case, shape-also learn to attend to just the right property-in this case, shape-for learning more object names.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 19
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   RECOGNITION-BY-COMPONENTS - A THEORY OF HUMAN IMAGE UNDERSTANDING [J].
BIEDERMAN, I .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1987, 94 (02) :115-147
[2]  
Bloom P., 2002, CHILDREN LEARN MEANI
[3]  
Fenson L., 1993, MACARTHUR COMMUNICAT
[4]   Why is a pomegranate an apple? The role of shape, taxonomic relatedness, and prior lexical knowledge in children's overextensions of apple and dog [J].
Gelman, SA ;
Croft, W ;
Fu, PF ;
Clausner, T ;
Gottfried, G .
JOURNAL OF CHILD LANGUAGE, 1998, 25 (02) :267-291
[5]   INFLUENCES OF CATEGORIZATION ON PERCEPTUAL DISCRIMINATION [J].
GOLDSTONE, R .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1994, 123 (02) :178-200
[6]  
JONES SS, IN PRESS DEV SCI
[7]   Two competing attentional mechanisms in category learning [J].
Kersten, AW ;
Goldstone, RL ;
Schaffert, A .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1998, 24 (06) :1437-1458
[8]   THE IMPORTANCE OF SHAPE IN EARLY LEXICAL LEARNING [J].
LANDAU, B ;
SMITH, LB ;
JONES, SS .
COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT, 1988, 3 (03) :299-321
[9]  
Markman E. M., 1989, Categorization and Naming in Children: Problems of Induction
[10]   Selective attention and the formation of linear decision boundaries [J].
McKinley, SC ;
Nosofsky, RM .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1996, 22 (02) :294-317