Ownership of environmental values and opportunity costs

被引:7
作者
Lovett, JC [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ York, Dept Environm, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ London Sch Oriental & African Studies, Dept Law, London WC1H 0XG, England
来源
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY | 2001年 / 19卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1068/c14s
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Conservationists have recently used the concept of opportunity costs to calculate potential costs of conserving key sites with high environmental values. However, the validity of this approach can be questioned. The author briefly reviews property rights and decisionmaking on matters involving environmental values. Two examples are discussed: nature conservation, and the planting of genetically modified crops. The examples are considered in relation to existence values, citizens' preferences, problems associated with aggregating social preferences, and the observation that there are costs associated with exercising rights. The problems of the use of opportunity costs as a means of compensation for lost rights to environmental values are those of (1) who should determine the values; (2) whether payments should be made as compensation or as fines; and (3) who should receive the payments. These problems raise issues of equity, particularly as poor people often have claims to rights over areas with high environmental values. In conclusion, the roles of equity and sovereignty in the distribution of entitlements are emphasised and the difficulty of taking a policy decision to use market mechanisms for conserving biodiversity is discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:681 / 693
页数:13
相关论文
共 52 条
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, UK FOR STAND GOV APP
[3]  
[Anonymous], J POLITICAL PHILOS
[4]  
[Anonymous], ENV MANAGEMENT EC DE
[5]   A DIFFICULTY IN THE CONCEPT OF SOCIAL WELFARE [J].
Arrow, Kenneth J. .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1950, 58 (04) :328-346
[6]   Integrating costs of conservation into international priority setting [J].
Balmford, A ;
Gaston, KJ ;
Rodrigues, ASL ;
James, A .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2000, 14 (03) :597-605
[7]   Food, consumer concerns, and trust: Food ethics for a globalizing market [J].
Brom, FWA .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 2000, 12 (02) :127-139
[8]   PROPERTY RULES, LIABILITY RULES, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS [J].
BROMLEY, DW .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ISSUES, 1978, 12 (01) :43-60
[9]  
Brundtland G.H., 1987, Our Common Future
[10]   PROPERTY RULES, LIABILITY RULES, AND INALIENABILITY - ONE VIEW OF CATHEDRAL [J].
CALABRESI, G ;
MELAMED, AD .
HARVARD LAW REVIEW, 1972, 85 (06) :1089-1182