Statistical power analysis in wildlife research

被引:294
作者
Steidl, RJ
Hayes, JP
Schauber, E
机构
[1] OREGON STATE UNIV, DEPT FISHERIES & WILDLIFE, OREGON COOPERAT WILDLIFE RES UNIT, CORVALLIS, OR 97331 USA
[2] OREGON STATE UNIV, DEPT FOREST SCI, CORVALLIS, OR 97331 USA
[3] OREGON STATE UNIV, HATFIELD MARINE SCI CTR, COASTAL OREGON PROD ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM, NEWPORT, OR 97365 USA
关键词
confidence intervals; effect size; experimental design; hypothesis testing; power; research design; sample size; statistical inference; statistical power analysis; type I error; type II error;
D O I
10.2307/3802582
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Statistical power analysis can be used to increase the efficiency of research efforts and to clarify research results, Power analysis is most valuable in the design or planning phases of research efforts. Such prospective (a priori) power analyses can be used to guide research design and to estimate the number of samples necessary to achieve a high probability of detecting biologically significant effects. Retrospective (a posteriori) power analysis has been advocated as a method to increase information about hypothesis tests that were not rejected. However, estimating power for tests of null hypotheses that were not rejected with the effect size observed in the study is incorrect; these power estimates will always be less than or equal to 0.50 when bias adjusted and have no relation to true power. Therefore, retrospective power estimates based on the observed effect size for hypothesis tests that were not rejected are misleading; retrospective power estimates are only meaningful when based on effect sizes other than the observed effect size, such as those effect sizes hypothesized to be biologically significant. Retrospectively power analysis can be used effectively to estimate the number of samples or effect size that would have been necessary for a completed study to have rejected a specific null hypothesis. Simply presenting confidence intervals can provide additional information about null hypotheses that were not rejected, including information about the size of the true effect and whether or not there is adequate evidence to ''accept'' a null hypothesis as true, We suggest that (1) statistical power analyses be routinely incorporated into research planning efforts to increase their efficiency; (2) confidence intervals be used in lieu of retrospective power analyses for null hypotheses that were not rejected to assess the likely size of the true effect, (3) minimum biologically significant effect sizes be used for all power analyses, and (4) if retrospective power estimates are to be reported, then the alpha-level, effect sizes, and sample sizes used in calculations must also be reported.
引用
收藏
页码:270 / 279
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], METHOD ECOLOGY
[2]  
Beier P, 1996, WILDLIFE SOC B, V24, P540
[3]  
BEYER WH, 1982, CRC HDB TABLES PROBA
[4]  
Borenstein M., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL
[5]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, V2
[6]  
DIXON PM, 1994, SETAC SP P, P439
[7]   SIGNIFICANCE TESTING TO ESTABLISH EQUIVALENCE BETWEEN TREATMENTS, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO DATA IN FORM OF 2 X 2 TABLES [J].
DUNNETT, CW ;
GENT, M .
BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (04) :593-602
[8]   An introduction to Bayesian inference for ecological research and environmental decision-making [J].
Ellison, AM .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 1996, 6 (04) :1036-1046
[9]   TESTS FOR BIOEQUIVALENCE OF CONTROL MEDIA AND TEST MEDIA IN STUDIES OF TOXICITY [J].
ERICKSON, WP ;
MCDONALD, LL .
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 1995, 14 (07) :1247-1256
[10]   A POWER ANALYSIS FOR DETECTING TRENDS [J].
GERRODETTE, T .
ECOLOGY, 1987, 68 (05) :1364-1372