Accuracy and reliability of sentinel node biopsy in patients with breast cancer. Single centre study with long term follow-up

被引:10
作者
Carcoforo, P
Sortini, D
Soliani, G
Basaglia, E
Feggi, L
Liboni, A
机构
[1] Univ Ferrara, Dept Surg Anaesthesiol & Radiol Sci, Sect Gen Surg, I-44100 Ferrara, Italy
[2] St Anna Hosp, Dept Radiol, Unit Nucl Med, Ferrara, Italy
关键词
axillary recurrence; breast cancer; false negative; sentinel node;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-005-9052-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The aim of our Study is to evaluate the frequency of false-negative (FN) sentinel node procedures in patients with breast cancer. A total of 791 breast cancer patients underwent sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy at our institution between July 1997 and February 2005. A 2-day protocol was used to localise the sentinel node with the injection of Tc-99m-nanocolloid. There were two phases in the study: the learning phase (50 patients) and the application phase (741 patients). In the learning phase, a complete lymphadenectomy was always performed. In the application phase, sentinel nodes were Studied postoperatively with breast cancer and lymphadenectomy was performed when considered warranted by the pathological postoperative results. The median follow-up duration in the 741 patients studied during the application phase was 32.3 months (range 6-72 months). In this phase a total of 787 sentinel nodes (719 axillary and 68 intramammary chain) were obtained (range 0-5 per patient, mean 1.01), with 153 (41 with micrometastasis) positive sentinel nodes. We observed a total or three FN SLN results (0.5%). All three presented as an axillary recurrence into 24 months from operation. After a median follow-up of 32.3 months we observed only three clinical recurrences among 741 patients. Our results indicate that the sentinel node protocol call give an adequate local control.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 116
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Current controversies in sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer [J].
Allweis, TM ;
Badriyyah, M ;
Bar Ad, V ;
Cohen, T ;
Freund, HR .
BREAST, 2003, 12 (03) :163-171
[2]   Patterns of recurrence after sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer [J].
Badgwell, BD ;
Povoski, SP ;
Abdessalam, SF ;
Young, DC ;
Farrar, WB ;
Walker, MJ ;
Yee, LD ;
Zervos, EE ;
Carson, WE ;
Burak, WE .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 10 (04) :376-380
[3]   Multicentre validation study of sentinel node biopsy for staging in breast cancer [J].
Bergkvist, L ;
Frisell, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 92 (10) :1221-1224
[4]   Relapse and morbidity in patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy alone or with axillary dissection for breast cancer [J].
Blanchard, DK ;
Donohue, JH ;
Reynolds, C ;
Grant, CS .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2003, 138 (05) :482-487
[5]  
Chua Boon, 2002, Breast J, V8, P15, DOI 10.1046/j.1524-4741.2002.08004.x
[6]   Clinical axillary recurrence in breast cancer patients after a negative sentinel node biopsy. [J].
Chung, MA ;
Steinhoff, MA ;
Cady, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 184 (04) :310-314
[7]   A trend analysis of the relative value of blue dye and isotope localization in 2,000 consecutive cases of sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer [J].
Derossis, AM ;
Fey, J ;
Yeung, H ;
Yeh, SDJ ;
Heerdt, AS ;
Petrek, J ;
VanZee, KJ ;
Montgomery, LL ;
Borgen, PI ;
Cody, HS .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2001, 193 (05) :473-478
[8]  
Dessureault S., 2000, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, V64, P26
[9]   Eight false negative sentinel node procedures in breast cancer: what went wrong? [J].
Estourgie, SH ;
Nieweg, OE ;
Olmos, RAV ;
Rutgers, EJT ;
Peterse, JL ;
Kroon, BBR .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 29 (04) :336-340
[10]   An original approach in the diagnosis of early breast cancer: use of the same radiopharmaceutical for both non-palpable lesions and sentinel node localisation [J].
Feggi, L ;
Basaglia, E ;
Corcione, S ;
Querzoli, P ;
Soliani, G ;
Ascanelli, S ;
Prandini, N ;
Bergossi, L ;
Carcoforo, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2001, 28 (11) :1589-1596