A node semantic similarity schema-matching method for multi-version Web Coverage Service retrieval

被引:8
作者
Chen, Nengcheng [1 ]
He, Jie [2 ]
Yang, Chao [1 ]
Wang, Chao [1 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Informat Engn Surveying Mapping & R, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
[2] Ningxia Univ, Sch Resources & Environm, Ningxia, Yinchuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
schema matching; Web Coverage Service; semantic relationship; conjunctive normal form; vector space model; WORDNET;
D O I
10.1080/13658816.2011.647821
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Different versions of the Web Coverage Service (WCS) schemas of the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) reflect semantic conflict. When applying the extended FRAG-BASE schema-matching approach (a schema-matching method based on COMA++, including an improved schema decomposition algorithm and schema fragments identification algorithm, which enable COMA++-based support to OGC Web Service schema matching), the average recall of WCS schema matching is only 72%, average precision is only 82% and average overall is only 57%. To improve the quality of multi-version WCS retrieval, we propose a schema-matching method that measures node semantic similarity (NSS). The proposed method is based on WordNet, conjunctive normal form and a vector space model. A hybrid algorithm based on label meanings and annotations is designed to calculate the similarity between label concepts. We translate the semantic relationships between nodes into a propositional formula and verify the validity of this formula to confirm the semantic relationships. The algorithm first computes the label and node concepts and then calculates the conceptual relationship between the labels. Finally, the conceptual relationship between nodes is computed. We then use the NSS method in experiments on different versions of WCS. Results show that the average recall of WCS schema matching is greater than 83%; average precision reaches 92%; and average overall is 67%.
引用
收藏
页码:1051 / 1072
页数:22
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Element similarity measures in XML schema matching [J].
Algergawy, Alsayed ;
Nayak, Richi ;
Saake, Gunter .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2010, 180 (24) :4975-4998
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, P 29 ANN M ASS COMP, DOI DOI 10.3115/981344.981378
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, PROC 10 RES COMPUTAT
[4]  
Bernstein PA, 2004, SIGMOD REC, V33, P38, DOI 10.1145/1041410.1041417
[5]  
Carmel D., 2002, SIGIR FORUM, V36, P1
[6]   Extended FRAG-BASE schema-matching method for multi-version open GIS Web services retrieval [J].
Chen, Nengcheng ;
He, Jie ;
Wang, Wei ;
Chen, Zeqiang .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2011, 25 (07) :1045-1068
[7]   Matching large schemas: Approaches and evaluation [J].
Do, Hong-Hai ;
Rahm, Erhard .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2007, 32 (06) :857-885
[8]  
Giunchiglia F, 2004, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V3053, P61
[9]   Semantic matching [J].
Giunchiglia, F ;
Shvaiko, P .
KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING REVIEW, 2003, 18 (03) :265-280
[10]  
Giunchiglia F., 2004, P MEAN COORD NEG WOR, P37