Comparatively weak after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on cortical excitability in humans

被引:365
作者
Antal, Andrea [1 ]
Boros, Klara [1 ]
Poreisz, Csaba [1 ]
Chaieb, Leila [1 ]
Terney, Daniella [1 ,2 ]
Paulus, Walter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gottingen, Dept Clin Neurophysiol, D-37075 Gottingen, Germany
[2] Univ Szeged, Dept Neurol, Szeged, Hungary
关键词
transcranial alternating current stimulation; transcranial magnetic stimulation; electroencephalogram; motor cortex; serial reaction time task;
D O I
10.1016/j.brs.2007.10.001
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective Inteference with brain rhythms by noninvasive transcranial stimulation that uses weak transcranial alternating current may reveal itself to be a new tool for investigating cortical mechanisms currently unresolved. Here. we aim to extend transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) techniques to transcranial alternating Current stimulation (tACS). Background Parameters such as electrode size and position were taken from those used ill Previous tDCS Studies. Methods Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), electroencephalogram (EEG)-power, and reaction times measured in a motor implicit learning task, were analyzed to detect changes in cortical excitability after 2-10 minutes of AC stimulation and sinusoidal DC stimulation (tSDCS) by using 1, W, 15, 30, and 45 Hz and sham stimulation over the primary motor cortex in 50 healthy subjects (eight-16 subjects in each study). Results A significantly improved implicit motor learning was observed after 10 Hz AC stimulation only. No significant changes were observed in any of the analyzed frequency bands of EEG and with regard to the MEP amplitudes after AC or tSDCS stimulation. Similarly, if the anodal or cathodal DC stimulation was superimposed on 5, 10, and 15 Hz AC stimulation, the MEP amplitudes did not change significantly. Conclusions Transcranial application of weak AC current may appear to be a tool for basic and clinical research in diseases with altered EEG activity. However, its effect seems to be weaker than tDCS stimulation, at in the present context of stimulus intensity and duration. Further studies are required to extend cautiously the safety range and uncover its influence on neuronal circuitries. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 105
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]
Transcranial direct current stimulation and the visual cortex [J].
Antal, A ;
Nitsche, MA ;
Paulus, W .
BRAIN RESEARCH BULLETIN, 2006, 68 (06) :459-463
[2]
BARKER AT, 1985, LANCET, V1, P1106
[3]
The concept of long term potentiation of transmission at synapses [J].
Bennett, MR .
PROGRESS IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2000, 60 (02) :109-137
[4]
Modulation of use-dependent plasticity by D-amphetamine [J].
Bütefisch, CM ;
Davis, BC ;
Sawaki, L ;
Waldvogel, D ;
Classen, J ;
Kopylev, L ;
Cohen, LG .
ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2002, 51 (01) :59-68
[5]
Cohen J., 1977, STAT POWER ANAL SOCI
[6]
Spatiotemporal analysis of local field potentials and unit discharges in cat cerebral cortex during natural wake and sleep states [J].
Destexhe, A ;
Contreras, D ;
Steriade, M .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 1999, 19 (11) :4595-4608
[7]
The differential role of premotor frontal cortex and basal ganglia in motor sequence learning: Evidence from focal basal ganglia lesions [J].
Exner, C ;
Koschack, J ;
Irle, E .
LEARNING & MEMORY, 2002, 9 (06) :376-386
[8]
Technology Insight: noninvasive brain stimulation in neurology - perspectives on the therapeutic potential of rTMS and tDCS [J].
Fregni, Felipe ;
Pascual-Leone, Alvaro .
NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE NEUROLOGY, 2007, 3 (07) :383-393
[9]
George MS, 2007, CURR OPIN PSYCHIATR, V20, P250
[10]
GRAFTON ST, 1992, J NEUROSCI, V12, P2542