Preoperative radiotherapy in rectal carcinoma - Aspects of acute adverse effects and radiation technique

被引:58
作者
Frykholm, GJ
Isacsson, U
Nygard, K
Montelius, A
Jung, B
Pahlman, L
Glimelius, B
机构
[1] UNIV UPPSALA, AKAD SJUKHUSET, DEPT ONCOL, S-75185 UPPSALA, SWEDEN
[2] UNIV UPPSALA, AKAD SJUKHUSET, DEPT SURG, S-75185 UPPSALA, SWEDEN
[3] UNIV UPPSALA, AKAD SJUKHUSET, SECT HOSP PHYS, S-75185 UPPSALA, SWEDEN
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 1996年 / 35卷 / 05期
关键词
rectal carcinoma; radiotherapy; three-dimensional dose planning; acute adverse effects; small bowel;
D O I
10.1016/0360-3016(96)00229-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To explain a possible association between treatment technique and postoperative mortality after preoperative radiotherapy of rectal carcinoma, the dose distributions were compared in model experiments. Methods and Materials: Preoperative radiotherapy with a three-beam technique delivered in five fractions to 25 Gy (5 Gy/daily for 5 or 7 days) was given to patients with primary resectable rectal carcinoma. The adverse effects of this treatment, both acute and late, have been low. In a parallel trial using an identical fractionation schedule and total dose but with a two-beam technique, the postoperative mortality was higher. Two-, three-, and four-beam techniques were analyzed in 20 patients with computed tomography based, three-dimensional dose planning. Dose distributions and dose-volume histograms in the planning target volume (PTV) and in the organs at risk were considered. A numerical ''biological'' model was used to compare the techniques. Results: The two-beam and the four-beam box techniques give the most homogeneous dose distributions in the PTV, although all techniques result in dose distributions that would be considered adequate, provided 16 MV or higher photon energies are used. Three- and four-beam techniques show advantages over the two-beam technique with respect to organs at risk, particularly the small bowel. With the two-beam technique and the upper beam limit at mid-IA, the volume of the bowel that receives >95% of the prescribed dose, and hence, is included in the treated volume (TV), is more than twice as large as that with three- and four-beam techniques, and that of the total body between 1.5 and 2 times as large. The results of the analyses using the biological model indicate that the three- and four-beam techniques result in less small bowel complication rates than the two-beam technique. The integral energy to the total body is similar for all treatment modalities compared. Conclusions: The volume of bowel included in the TV, rather than the energy imparted to the body, influences postoperative mortality, and emphasizes the importance of precise radiotherapy planning to minimize normal tissue toxicity.
引用
收藏
页码:1039 / 1048
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
BALSLEV IB, 1986, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V58, P22, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19860701)58:1<22::AID-CNCR2820580106>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-Q
[3]   THE EFFECT OF TREATMENT TIME AND TREATMENT INTERRUPTION ON TUMOR-CONTROL FOLLOWING RADICAL RADIOTHERAPY OF LARYNGEAL-CANCER [J].
BARTON, MB ;
KEANE, TJ ;
GADALLA, T ;
MAKI, E .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1992, 23 (03) :137-143
[4]   ADJUVANT TREATMENT IN THE CURATIVE MANAGEMENT OF RECTAL-CANCER - A CRITICAL-REVIEW OF THE RESULTS OF CLINICAL RANDOMIZED TRIALS [J].
BOSSET, JF ;
HORIOT, JC .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1993, 29A (05) :770-774
[5]   FITTING OF NORMAL TISSUE TOLERANCE DATA TO AN ANALYTIC-FUNCTION [J].
BURMAN, C ;
KUTCHER, GJ ;
EMAMI, B ;
GOITEIN, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 21 (01) :123-135
[6]   VOLUME AND HETEROGENEITY DEPENDENCE OF THE DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP FOR HEAD AND NECK TUMORS [J].
CRONQVIST, AKA ;
KALLMAN, P ;
TURESSON, I ;
BRAHME, A .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 1995, 34 (06) :851-860
[7]   ADJUVANT RADIOTHERAPY IN RECTAL-CANCER - THE MRC TRIALS [J].
DUNCAN, W .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1985, 72 :S59-S62
[8]   TOLERANCE OF NORMAL TISSUE TO THERAPEUTIC IRRADIATION [J].
EMAMI, B ;
LYMAN, J ;
BROWN, A ;
COIA, L ;
GOITEIN, M ;
MUNZENRIDER, JE ;
SHANK, B ;
SOLIN, LJ ;
WESSON, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 21 (01) :109-122
[9]   ENDPOINTS FOR DAMAGE TO NORMAL-TISSUES [J].
FIELD, SB ;
MICHALOWSKI, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1979, 5 (08) :1185-1196
[10]   HOW WORTHWHILE ARE SHORT SCHEDULES IN RADIOTHERAPY - A SERIES OF EXPLORATORY CALCULATIONS [J].
FOWLER, JF .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1990, 18 (02) :165-181