Loading of bone surrounding implants through three-unit fixed partial denture fixation:: a finite-element analysis based on in vitro and in vivo strain measurements

被引:34
作者
Heckmann, SM
Karl, M
Wichmann, MG
Winter, W
Graef, F
Taylor, TD
机构
[1] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Sch Dent Med, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Inst Appl Mech, Erlangen, Germany
[3] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Inst Appl Math, Erlangen, Germany
[4] Univ Connecticut, Dept Prosthodont, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
关键词
bone loading; cemented; finite-element analysis; in vivo strain measurements; passive fit; screw retained;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01177.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 [口腔医学];
摘要
Implant-borne fixed partial dentures (FPDs), whether cementable or screwable superstructures, ought to display a true passive fit. The objective of this in vivo-based finite-element analysis is, therefore, to quantify the degree of stress which occurs in the bone around the implants as a result of the fixation of cemented and screw-retained FPDs. On the basis of a simulated patient situation with two implants, six groups of implant-supported superstructures containing 10 samples each were fabricated. Strain gauges which were mounted on the pontics of the restorations were subsequently used to take in vivo measurements (Ethics Commission Approval No. 2315). Taking the values obtained as a basis, the von Mises equivalent stress was chosen to illustrate bone loading in three-dimensional finite-element models. Superstructure fixation caused residual interface stress as high as 30 MPa. Similar stress magnitudes can be observed for axial implant loading of 200 N. Assuming that the axial loading of a single implant with 200 N is within the bone's physiological range, it can be concluded that the degree of stress resulting from the fixation of superstructures alone does not constitute a risk.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 350
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]
Assif D, 1996, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V11, P216
[2]
Branemark P I, 1977, Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl, V16, P1
[3]
The response of bone in primates around unloaded dental implants supporting prostheses with different levels of fit [J].
Carr, AB ;
Gerard, DA ;
Larsen, PE .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1996, 76 (05) :500-509
[4]
Chee W, 1999, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V14, P137
[5]
DeTolla D H, 2000, J Oral Implantol, V26, P77, DOI 10.1563/1548-1336(2000)026<0077:TROTFE>2.3.CO
[6]
2
[7]
The influence of static and dynamic loading on marginal bone reactions around osseointegrated implants: an animal experimental study [J].
Duyck, J ;
Ronold, HJ ;
Van Oosterwyck, H ;
Naert, I ;
Sloten, JV ;
Ellingsen, JE .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2001, 12 (03) :207-218
[8]
FERIOTTO G, 1995, MINERVA BIOTECNOL, V7, P111
[9]
Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: A review of the literature [J].
Geng, JP ;
Tan, KBC ;
Liu, GR .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2001, 85 (06) :585-598
[10]
Haack J E, 1995, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V10, P529