Communication forms in US presidential campaigns - Influences on candidate perceptions and the democratic process

被引:32
作者
Pfau, M [1 ]
Cho, J [1 ]
Chong, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Journalism & Mass Commun, Madison, WI 53706 USA
来源
HARVARD INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRESS-POLITICS | 2001年 / 6卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1177/108118001129172350
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This study examined the influence of various communication forms or modalities on prospective voters' perceptions of candidates and their attitudes about the democratic process during the 2000 presidential election campaign. A total of 450 prospective voters were surveyed during the final three weeks of the 2000 campaign about communication use, perceptions of the two major party candidates, and attitudes about the democratic process. After controlling for respondents' age, gender, education, strength of party identification, and the number of candidate ads recalled, the results indicated that use of nontraditional communication forms (such as political talk radio and,to a somewhat lesser extent, television entertainment talk shows,television talk shows, and television news magazines) exerted the most influence on perceptions of presidential candidates. Among traditional communication forms,people's use of televised debates exerted considerable influence, but newspapers, magazines, and television news exerted very limited impact. In contrast to this pattern of findings regarding communication use and candidate perceptions, people's use of more traditional communication forms, especially televised debates and newspapers,was associated with positive attitudes about the democratic process, whereas nontraditional media exerted no significant influence on process.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 105
页数:18
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   IMPACT OF A PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE ON VOTER RATIONALITY [J].
ABRAMOWITZ, AI .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1978, 22 (03) :680-690
[2]  
[Anonymous], AM KNOW POLITICS WHY
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1987, Poor Reception: Misunderstanding and forgetting broadcast news
[4]  
[Anonymous], GREAT DEBATES CARTER
[5]  
Ansolabehere StephenShanto Iyengar., 1995, Going negative: How political advertisements shrink and polarize the electorate
[6]  
Asher H.B., 1984, THEORY BUILDING DATA
[7]  
Asher H.B., 1983, CAUSAL MODELING, V2nd
[8]  
ATKIN CK, 1980, PERSUASION NEW DIREC
[9]   NEWSPAPER AND TELEVISION DEPENDENCIES - EFFECTS ON EVALUATIONS OF PUBLIC OFFICIALS [J].
BECKER, LB ;
SOBOWALE, IA ;
CASEY, WE .
JOURNAL OF BROADCASTING, 1979, 23 (04) :465-475
[10]   EFFECTS OF MEDIA DEPENDENCIES - AUDIENCE ASSESSMENT OF GOVERNMENT [J].
BECKER, LB ;
WHITNEY, DC .
COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 1980, 7 (01) :95-120