Therapeutic misconception in early phase gene transfer trials

被引:84
作者
Henderson, GE [1 ]
Easter, MM [1 ]
Zimmer, C [1 ]
King, NMP [1 ]
Davis, AM [1 ]
Rothschild, BB [1 ]
Churchill, LR [1 ]
Wilfond, BS [1 ]
Nelson, DK [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
关键词
USA; clinical trials; informed consent; therapeutic misconception; gene transfer research; benefit;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.05.022
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Many subjects in early phase clinical trials expect to benefit in some way from the research intervention. It is understandable that people hope for improvement in their condition, no matter what the evidence. Yet unreasonable expectation of medical benefit may reflect problems with informed consent: Investigators may not disclose clearly that direct medical benefit from an early phase experimental intervention is unlikely or impossible, or subjects may not appreciate the differences between treatment and research. This paper presents findings from recent interviews with researchers and subjects and analysis of consent forms in early phase gene transfer research, a cutting-edge technology often called 'gene therapy. We use three variables to construct a composite measure of therapeutic misconception TM, tapping misconceptions about the purposes of early phase research and the potential for direct medical benefit in these trials. Our multivariate model demonstrates the importance of both subject- and study-level factors as predictors of this TM index: education, disease type, and communication by study personnel about the likelihood of benefit. We hope that this work will deepen the discussion of how to define and measure TM, and refine the specification of factors that are related to subjects' TM. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 253
页数:15
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
*ACHRE, 1995, FIN REP ADV COMM HUM
[2]  
Ackerman Terrence F, 1995, IRB, V17, P1, DOI 10.2307/3563638
[3]   Ethics of phase 1 oncology studies - Reexamining the arguments and data [J].
Agrawal, M ;
Emanuel, EJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 290 (08) :1075-1082
[4]  
Appelbaum Paul S, 2004, IRB, V26, P1, DOI 10.2307/3564231
[5]   THE THERAPEUTIC MISCONCEPTION - INFORMED CONSENT IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH [J].
APPELBAUM, PS ;
ROTH, LH ;
LIDZ, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY, 1982, 5 (3-4) :319-329
[6]   Impact of quality of life on patient expectations regarding phase I clinical trials [J].
Cheng, JD ;
Hitt, J ;
Koczwara, B ;
Schulman, KA ;
Burnett, CB ;
Gaskin, DJ ;
Rowland, JH ;
Meropol, NJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (02) :421-428
[7]   Genetic research as therapy: Implications of "gene therapy" for informed consent [J].
Churchill, LR ;
Collins, ML ;
King, NMP ;
Pemberton, SG ;
Wailoo, KA .
JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 1998, 26 (01) :38-47
[8]   PERCEPTIONS OF CANCER-PATIENTS AND THEIR PHYSICIANS INVOLVED IN PHASE-I TRIALS [J].
DAUGHERTY, C ;
RATAIN, MJ ;
GROCHOWSKI, E ;
STOCKING, C ;
KODISH, E ;
MICK, R ;
SIEGLER, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (05) :1062-1072
[9]  
Daugherty C K, 2000, IRB, V22, P6, DOI 10.2307/3564113
[10]   The ubiquity and utility of the therapeutic misconception [J].
Dresser, R .
SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY & POLICY, 2002, 19 (02) :271-294