A probabilistic framework for comparison of dam breach parameters and outflow hydrograph generated by different empirical prediction methods

被引:21
作者
Ahmadisharaf, Ebrahim [1 ]
Kalyanapu, Alfred J. [2 ]
Thames, Brantley A. [3 ]
Lillywhite, Jason [4 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech, Dept Biol Syst Engn, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[2] Tennessee Technol Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 1020 Stadium Dr,Box 5015, Cookeville, TN 38505 USA
[3] US Army Corps Engineers, 801 Broadway, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[4] GoldSim Technol Grp, 22500 SE 64th Pl,Suite 240, Issaquah, WA 98027 USA
关键词
Probabilistic dam breach model; Dam breach prediction; Uncertainty analysis; Multivariate analysis; DECISION-SUPPORT-SYSTEM; MODEL CALIBRATION; FLOOD MANAGEMENT; CLIMATE-CHANGE; UNCERTAINTY; RISK; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.09.022
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This study presents a probabilistic framework to simulate dam breach and evaluates the impact of using four empirical dam breach prediction methods on breach parameters (i.e., geometry and timing) and outflow hydrograph attributes (i.e., time to peak, hydrograph duration and peak). The methods that are assessed here include MacDonald and Langridge-Monopolis (1984), Von Thun and Gillette (1990), Froehlich (1995), 2008). Mean values and percentiles of breach parameters and outflow hydrograph attributes are compared for hypothetical overtopping failure of Burnett Dam in the state of North Carolina, USA. Furthermore, utilizing the probabilistic framework, the least and most uncertain methods alongside those giving the most critical value are identified for these parameters. The multivariate analysis also indicates that lone use of breach parameters is not necessarily sufficient to characterize outflow hydrograph attributes. However, timing characteristic of the breach is generally a more important driver than its geometric features. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:248 / 263
页数:16
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
Ahmadisharaf E, 2016, THESIS
[2]  
Ahmadisharaf E., 2013, DAM SAF C ASDSO PROV, P263
[3]   Spatial probabilistic multi-criteria decision making for assessment of flood management alternatives [J].
Ahmadisharaf, Ebrahim ;
Kalyanapu, Alfred J. ;
Chung, Eun-Sung .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2016, 533 :365-378
[4]  
Ahmadisharaf E, 2015, World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2015: Floods, Droughts, and Ecosystems, P1050
[5]   Evaluating the Effects of Inundation Duration and Velocity on Selection of Flood Management Alternatives Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making [J].
Ahmadisharaf, Ebrahim ;
Kalyanapu, Alfred J. ;
Chung, Eun-Sung .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2015, 29 (08) :2543-2561
[6]   A FRAMEWORK FOR ERROR ANALYSIS OF A LONG-RANGE TRANSPORT MODEL WITH EMPHASIS ON PARAMETER UNCERTAINTY [J].
ALCAMO, J ;
BARTNICKI, J .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1987, 21 (10) :2121-2131
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Nartural Hazards Earth Syst, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11069-010-9558-X
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2007, THESIS
[9]  
ASCE, 2013, 2013 REP CARD AM INF
[10]   THE FUTURE OF DISTRIBUTED MODELS - MODEL CALIBRATION AND UNCERTAINTY PREDICTION [J].
BEVEN, K ;
BINLEY, A .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 1992, 6 (03) :279-298